Tehran – Kaihan wrote in commentary on Iranian-European lectures. The Iranian-Europe talks in Geneva reportedly have not been very successful, with Europeans saying they have made a tough position in the talks.
The recent talks between Iran and Europe were said to have been better than before, but if the talks had progressed well, the French president and Swedish officials would not have made a statement to Iran. In the current state of relations between Iran and Europe, some realities cannot be ignored. Europeans consider America’s position in their interaction with Iran. They are moving in the direction of Washington and prefer the United States to Iran. Just like during Trump’s first term, they often succumbed to American pressure, particularly to economic transactions. Contrary to popular belief, Europe and the United States are in line with many issues related to Iran. Like the US, Europeans believe in including Iran. They disagree with many issues, but they agree with Iran’s issues.
Siasat-e-Rooz: Conference for greater convergence
Siasat-e-Rooz has dedicated his editorial to a trilateral meeting between China, Iran and Russia in Beijing. It writes: At the same time as the issue of nuclear negotiations between Iran and the JCPOA political party, China’s Foreign Ministry announced that the country will negotiate with Iran and Russia on Beijing’s Iran nuclear issue. Recently, Americans have been trying to put Iran into a situation. However, the Beijing Conference is a disappointment for the West, claiming that Tehran is alone in the world. Iran, Russia and China are three main members of the Shanghai Cooperation Agency and BRICS, which the US threatened to impose heavy sanctions. Given the great capabilities of the three countries, the Beijing Conference is a kind of convergence that resists the irrational, unilateral policy of the United States in the economic field. The conference has a nuclear and global dimension that strengthens the convergence between the three great forces in the New World Order, in the face of Western pressure.
Vatan-e-Emrooz: What is the logic of American domestic supporters?
In his analysis, Vatan-e-Emrooz discusses accomplices with the Zionist regime in the United States, and in modern history, few countries support crimes against humanity and state terrorism as much as the United States. Using military, diplomacy and economic power, the country not only supports oppressive regimes, but also in many cases directly contributes to the emergence of the world’s humanitarian crises. The American policy supporting Israeli crime shows that the country does not show a commitment to human rights principles and uses war criminals as a tool to promote colonial policy. But there are Western-leaning individuals who are constantly talking about negotiating with the US and reaching agreements, but history proves that America is a dishonest, oppressive country and an enemy of humanity. With all these interpretations, an informed conscience confirms and has no consequences for America to rely on, not before, and never to be trusted. It leaves us with disastrous results like Ukraine.
Ettelaat: Don’t act as if what Americans want to happen
In an interview with international relations expert Hassan Beheshtipour, Ettelaat discussed Trump’s letter and delivery to Iran by Anwar Gargash, the envoy of the top Emirati. He said: It looks like a new game. The United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman are all interested in improving relations between Iran and the United States, particularly the Emirates. Dubai is Iran’s major trading partner. Now, if Iran and the US relations normalize, it will benefit Abu Dhabi. The United Arab Emirates may feel threatened as it will be lost in the event of an Iran-US conflict. We act here as if Americans are absolute power, everything is determined by their will, and they are the ones who decide everything, but not. The reality is that in the message they gave, the security aspect is important to them and was given to the security figures. Anwar Gargash is clearly Emirates’ top security officer and is like an advisor on foreign affairs.