In his explanation, Jam-e-Jam dealt with a contradictory statement by the US in negotiations with Iran. It writes: These contradictions in the US position are likely the result of discords within the Trump security team. Multiple reports from American media, particularly Axios, show that Trump’s national security members are in serious disagreement about the best approach to addressing Iran’s nuclear issue.
Some members of the security team led by Vice President JD Vance have emphasized political negotiations, while others have pushed the greatest pressure on Iran and even military action. These differences not only caused disruption to US foreign policy, but also undermined Washington’s credibility in the international sector. Trump has consistently shown contradictions in his position, which would significantly reduce the chances of a permanent agreement. This disruption could lead to the loss of existing opportunities to resolve Iran’s nuclear issue, especially on the eve of the second round of negotiations.
Farhikhtegan: Witkoff’s inconsistent stance is part of the plan
After the first round of negotiations with Iran, Fahktegan examined Witkov’s changing stance, writing: He also said his statement is fully in cooperation with Trump. The changing statement by Witkoff appears to be a pre-determined plan to win at the negotiation table and ultimately pursue the same goals they emphasize in their media statements. The key point is that the US wants to acquire these concessions from Iran in stages. Therefore, the need to be vigilant and have clear ideas and frameworks for negotiations with Americans is more felt than ever. Americans are now pursuing carrot and stick policies in the style of Trump’s policy. They are looking to score more points with a series of green lights for negotiations and the threat of military attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Arman-e-Emrooz: A new move to undermine extremist negotiations
In the memo, Ahman et M.Ruz worked on a new extremist plan to undermine negotiations, saying: Political analysts believe that extremists are more concerned about the outcome of the negotiations than anything else. Because if successful, not only strengthens the position of the incumbent government, but their stories will also be questioned. According to the observer, this change in tactical stance indicates an attempt to maintain a social and political foundation in new circumstances. According to political affairs expert Heshmatollah Falahatpishheh, we witnessed Americans adopting a tough position right after the first round (of negotiations). This series of situations shows that negotiating teams are facing serious challenges, and what can be expected is that extremists across the country do not cause additional problems in this situation.
Ettelaat: Billions of dollars flow to Iran in the case of the Tehran-Washington agreement
In an interview with former Diplomat Feredouun Majlesi, Ettelaat discussed the benefits of a possible nuclear deal with the US. He said: A possible agreement between Iran and the US would provide economic cooperation and billions of dollars in profits to Iranian contractors and exporters. If negotiations are successful, a better relationship with China will be established without fear of sanctions. Currently, Turkey is an industrialized country, Saudi Arabia has taken a step towards advanced industrialization, is the world leader of petrochemists, and requires imports from Saudi Arabia, but in the current situation, trade with Saudi Arabia is very low due to sanctions. Even now there is a wealth of trade with the UAE, not to mention the lifting of sanctions. Qatar, Kuwait and Iraq are also developing, and the agreement between Iran and the US will provide economic cooperation and billions of dollars in profits to Iranian contractors and exporters. Sanctions use Iran’s problems to their advantage and benefit only for dealers who generally withdraw money from Iran.