Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaille Baghhai said on Tuesday that Tehran’s options to meet such a resolution were prepared in cooperation with Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization (AEOI).
He criticized the recent report by the IAEA Director on Iran’s nuclear program. Iran claimed it was unable to report nuclear activity in three undeclared locations, raising concerns about the state’s stockpile of uranium stockpile.
Baghaei said the Rafael Grossi report was politically motivated to serve the agenda of the US and its European allies.
He said Grossi’s remarks serve the political purpose of the country, the enemy of Iran.
Baghaei emphasized that Iran hopes that IAEA chiefs will not try to justify them, but will condemn the repeated threat posed by the US and Israel.
He reiterated that Iran’s nuclear programme has never deviated from a peaceful course, according to IAEA standards and the Non-Compulsory Treaty (NPT).
Iranian officials have previously condemned the IAEA’s confidential report, warning that politically motivated movements against the Islamic Republic could derail Tehran’s cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog.
The agency has imposed multiple politically contaminated accusations against the Islamic Republic’s nuclear file over the past few years, despite its own reports that prove the peace of Tehran’s nuclear program.
The Iranian nuclear chief said earlier Tuesday that recent remarks by the UN Nuclear Director-General on nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic were not technical and legally effective, but also focused on Zionist psychological operations against Tehran.
Mohammad Eslami, head of AEOI, made his statement while dealing with the statement made by Grossi.
“Grossi’s statement lacks technical and legal aspects,” an Iranian official said the IAEA chief’s discourse was “a product of the psychological and political operations played by the Zionist regime” against the Islamic Republic.
By passing the statement, he said that Grossi clearly showed “his (true) character” and proved to be among those visiting the Sipes against Iran for a long time.
However, the Islamic Republic is the most vetted member of the IAEA, and the institution found no evidence to support alleged “repurpose.”
Tehran itself has also adamantly ruled out the prospect of pursuing, acquiring or maintaining nuclear weapons in line with moral and religious guidelines.
The campaign has recently emerged in the form of European countries that plan to force the IAEA to force anti-Iran resolutions that could cause a “snapback” of UN sanctions on the Islamic Republic. The agency’s board of directors may issue resolutions against the state during scheduled sessions under pressure on Monday.
MNA/