In Tehran -commentary, Arman Emery examined the possibility of direct negotiations between Iran and the United States to resolve nuclear disputes.
It is written as follows. Almost a considerable proportion of society, analysts, and experts acknowledges negotiations, interactions, and the important part of lies in lies in international agreements. And the more you follow this path, the more you can benefit from the results of the national problem, especially economic problems. Negotiations with the west are as important as negotiations with East. For this reason, Iran’s representative went to Geneva for the second round of negotiations with European Troika. However, these negotiations are continued, and Americans seem to be participating in discussions because the conditions are ripe to reach new agreements. However, some believe that playing with European cards has proven that Iran has a very positive or good result. We recommend that you put an intermediary aside and negotiate directly. If you do so, we recommend that you make direct dialogue without a mediator to release sanctions.
Etemad: The fantastic world of sabotage
In the analysis, Etemado discusses Trump’s movements that freezes a budget of $ 60 million for foreign -based Iranian destroyers, and Trump opposes the destroyers on the first day of his Islam. It has been said that he was disappointed and even more impaired. The presidential position says that the US government will no longer pay them. Approximately $ 60 million, given to the destroyers claiming that they have a change project on their agenda, are frozen. For many people, it was clear that the observers were providing us and Israel. Trump’s reduction in funding indicates that the observer is facing major problems. People who are independent and patriotic have revealed that they are neither independent nor ethnicists. Trump has destroyed the plan of the destruction. They thought that the Trump and the Trump Netagnaf Alliance had ended the Islamic Republic. Opposition parties do not know the origin, nor a clear vision of what they are looking for. For them, illusion is a way of life. Their methods are political struggles and appeal to the United States and Israel. But suddenly, Trump confuses them.
Javan: Negotiate with unknown imperialism!
Javan gives a headline of the problem of accepting the United States in the negotiating process, and states: If you want to negotiate with the United States, it’s not enough to claim that the government knows the United States well. Success negotiations are the explanation of the American imperial nature to society. Iran’s agreement with the United States is not an agreement between the two governments, but rather the agreement between the two countries. The profit or loss occurs in both countries. If the true understanding of American imperialism is more clear with Trump’s claims than in other countries, it has reached a mysterious agreement from the United States. Corresponding to the failure of the Iranian government, about Iranian culture and identity. Due to this complete understanding, failures are more catastrophic than negotiations failure.
Iran: See Washington’s negotiation plan
In the commentary, the Iranian newspaper discussed the Washington negotiations in a report conducted by Economist. Economist’s predictions on the structure of the agreement between Iran and the United States are based on unlucky concessions and have a very serious ambiguity. It is one of the ambiguity of concessions given to Iran to normalize the relationship with Saudi Arabia, which happened without the United States. One of these concessions is that Iran abandoned local activities (support for resistance groups fighting Israel). Iran must first agree to negotiate local issues. Given the recent military development, Iran’s approach seems to have shifted from a deterrence across borders to deterrence on the country. With this approach, problems such as Palestine and Yemen are considered a country or regional problem that requires independent solutions. In addition, an agreement to not provide military support to these countries’ resistance groups requires a mechanism of monitoring and verification that is very difficult and almost impossible.