Earlier this week, it appeared that the Trump administration was planning to follow the threat of imposing a total 25% tariff on Canada’s exports to the United States. Canada is “paying a lot of money and I’m sure they’ll pay,” President Donald Trump argued. “We may have a bit of pain in the short term and people may understand that. But in the long term, the US has been torn apart by almost every country in the world. “Ottawa has been sent scramble to respond, announcing a series of retaliatory tariffs, covering $150 billion in an array of US products, including appliances, machinery and agricultural products. “Taxes on Canada could put (US) employment at risk and close American auto assembly plants and other manufacturing facilities,” warned Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
However, after a string of calls with Trump, Trudeau was able to secure a 30-day suspension of tariffs in the final moments. (Mexico, facing a similar threat from Trump, also gained a reprieve.) In exchange, Trudeau has made various previously announced investments in increasing personnel and surveillance functions aimed at illegal control. It provided a series of measures to reinforce Canada’s borders, including; The struggle between immigration and fentanyl.
The suspension is good news for Canadians, especially for Canadians, who would have suffered immediate economic harm if Trump had continued. But in other ways, the damage has already been done. Trump’s decision to punish neighbors, allies and one of the US’s closest economic partners in a more commonly reserved way for the enemy is an example of a fundamental shift in Washington’s approach to alliances It’s a movement without any. The treatment he has directed towards Canada is a harbinger of what comes for its European and Asian allies. Recently, Trump has disciplined Taiwan for surplus in trade with the US and warned the European Union that tariffs “coming soon.”
The Trump administration’s brute force’s doctrine of economic coercion was abolished through tariffs, executive orders and exercise of financial hegemony in Washington, threatening to translate transatlantic and Indo-Pacific relations into almost purely trading issues. It will be available. The result will hurt everyone involved and help American enemies such as China and Russia. In the short term, Canada (and other US allies, just like their order)’s most practical approach is to respond in a clear way that is tailored to Trump’s threat. This is easier said than done, as domestic politics often encourages responses driven by pride and nationalism. Canadians and others must resist the temptation to assault. Countermaube and retaliation are required, but overreactions only hurt Canada’s economic and security interests in the long run.
Transaction Man
Trump’s approach to foreign policy is rooted in zero-sum, trading mentality, where economic leverage represents a key tool in statecraft. Traditional diplomacy and alliance management are being relegated to the bystanders in favor of an offensive, protectionist agenda that prioritizes immediate economic interests over long-term strategic stability. Many American allies have become accustomed to criticism from Washington of trade imbalances and defense spending, but Trump uses weapons generally reserved for Washington’s enemies to make it seem like a thing of their own. He was the first US president in a modern era that transforms grievances into direct economic warfare against his partners.
Trump’s rhetoric reveals that his administration considers all economic ties, including people, including allies, to be inherently hostile. This approach creates uncertainty among US partners and raises concerns that Washington’s commitment to collective security and economic cooperation is conditioned on short-term transaction benefits. Trump’s advocates argue that his approach is necessary to address trade imbalances and force allies to take their commitment to security more seriously. However, the long-term outcome of his economic belligerence was largely negative for all involved. For example, the steel and aluminum tariffs placed in Canada by the Trump administration in 2018 have prompted retaliation measures that harmed American businesses and consumers without providing significant strategic benefits.
Fighting economic wars in allies is a risk of mistrust and risk, and destroying the transatlantic and Indo-Pacific security architecture.
However, Fallout is far beyond the final outcome. Fighting economic wars in allies is a risk of mistrust and risk, and destroying the transatlantic and Indo-Pacific security architecture. If Washington imposes tariffs on its European and Asian allies, it will create a wedge that enemies such as China and Russia will eagerly exploit. For example, Beijing is seeking to promote deeper disparities between the US and Europe by presenting its position as a more reliable economic partner. Moscow is taking advantage of transatlantic tensions to reduce NATO aggregation. By sharing military cooperation, economic agreements and hostility towards the West, the growing strategic partnership between these two powers represents a direct challenge to the US-led world order. By undermining trust with allies through indiscriminate economic attacks, Washington risks quarantining when it is more important than ever to maintain a strong, unified alliance.
The difficult truth
Trump’s trading approach to the alliance can be shortsighted and counterproductive, but his broader criticism of the burden-sharing is not without merit. Many of Washington’s allies rely on US military force as security blankets to underinvest in their own defense. Canada is a clear example, with defense budgets accounting for around 1.4% of GDP, consistently malnutrition, failing to fulfill its continental safety obligations and making further sustainable contributions. Needless to say, it’s the military. In the Indo-Pacific, key US allies such as Japan have historically constrained military spending and capabilities despite facing direct threats from China and North Korea. However, the most obvious example of this imbalance is the NATO Alliance. Until recently, most member states like Canada have failed to meet the alliance’s goal of spending 2% of their GDP on defense.
Meanwhile, many revisionist countries are working together and coordinating more deeply than ever before, making it easier for the enemy to threaten, making it easier for a wider group to challenge orders based on US-led rules. It’s there. This must be a wake-up call for allies to do more to enhance their security. The era of guaranteed American military hegemony, which could take on global stability at almost a cost to its partners, is over. US allies must recognize that their investment in defense is not just a concession to Washington’s demands, but a necessary adaptation to an increasingly dangerous world. In Canada, this means viewing national security and defense as top line items, not budgeting. Ottawa needs to modernize its capabilities, particularly its naval assets and surveillance capabilities, in order to demonstrate its credibility as a frontline advocate of the North American flank. Other allies need to take similar steps. European countries must accelerate their efforts to modernize their troops, strengthen military preparation, and reduce their dependence on the US military. In the Indo-Pacific, countries such as Australia, Japan and South Korea must build their own troops to deepen their security cooperation and ensure regional stability.
The need for greater sharing of burdens exceeds military spending. Allies must also strengthen their economic resilience to coercion from hostile states that are beyond the favor of bullying Trump. US allies reduce China’s supply chain dependence, diversify energy sources, secure critical infrastructure from cyber and espionage threats, and coordinate responses to economic pressure tactics used by Beijing and Moscow It must be.
Ottawa can begin that process by taking several key steps for its own security. First, while discussions with the Trump administration over trade and borders (particularly on the fight against fentanyl trafficking) continue, the division between the two countries is now more than trade, and Ottawa must support it. It is important to remember that no defensive spending is to strengthen reliability in Washington. But the trade war that almost breaks out this week and could possibly occur next month is a call for awakening to Canada and other US allies, and needs to be creative in terms of trade adjustments and geopolitical positioning. It’s something. For all of them, the United States remains an existential economic and security partner. But it does not rule out US allies, including those in Europe and the Indo-Pacific, from pursuing energy, agriculture and safety partnerships that have no involvement in Washington at all.
In an ideal world, the US encourages allies to meet or exceed their defence commitments, not through punitive economic measures, but through diplomatic engagement, security incentives, and co-investment in defense technologies. Sho. But that’s not the world Trump is trying to bring. Canada is the first ally to taste what he intends to do. But that’s not the last one.
(Source: Foreign Affairs)
****** h