“I told you not to trust,” published by Iran’s Shaheed Kazemi Publications, is a comprehensive review of the attitudes and statements of the leaders of the Islamic Revolution on nuclear negotiations with the United States in recent years.
The 400-page book consists of six chapters that delve into Iran’s consultations with European countries on Tehran’s peaceful nuclear program.
The first chapter, “Major Analysis of the Iranian current situation,” outlines the Iranian leader’s stance on dealing with issues within the Islamic system and his approach to facing them.
Chapter 2, “Two Big Views for Solving the Nation’s Problems,” presents two different management approaches, each with their own unique strategies. Using nuclear issues as a prime example, we explore Iranian leaders presenting approaches and their respective outcomes. This chapter unravels why previous governments prioritized nuclear negotiations and highlights the strategic mistakes of excessive trust and dependence on the West.
Chapter 3, “Threat-to-Open Sanctions,” examines the crucial issues that drove the government at the time towards nuclear negotiations. The government is seeking sanctions relief for economic revitalization and claims it lacks a full understanding of the nature, impact and effective management of sanctions.
Chapter 4, “Criticism of Government Macro Approach and Performance in Foreign Policy,” provides specific examples of leaders’ strategic criticism of government’s comprehensive perspectives on foreign policy, the US, and West. Masu.
Chapter 5, “Leaders’ Wise Actions in Foreign Policy, Nuclear Negotiations and JCPOA,” is considered the core of the book, and provides an overview of three iterative approaches to leaders’ nuclear negotiations and provides comprehensiveness. . Analysis of Iran’s nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan.
Finally, Chapter 6, “Predicting America’s Decline,” gives a broader view of Iran-US relations. It argues that the premise of global control in the United States that underpinned nuclear negotiations is flawed. Instead, the leaders assume that Iran has declined the US despite 40 years of challenge.
This conclusion rebuts the notion that the JCPOA is a reactive measure of the US power designed to avoid the destruction of Iran through sanctions and threats. This is an analysis that is considered unfounded by leaders.
Reported by Tohid Mahmoudpour