It’s hard to convince the courts to limit Elon Musk’s power in the federal government now when no one can say exactly what he’s doing.
Four recent federal judges said plaintiffs who are suing to cut work at government ministry agencies could not gather enough legal reasons for the court to intervene immediately. .
The latest Tuesday was DC District Court Judge Tanya Chatkan and Democratic-led state attorney general to “immediate and irreparable harm” for Doge’s work in seven federal agencies. He said he didn’t show he was facing. Three times starting this weekend, Chutan’s colleague on the federal bench in Washington, DC, made similar calls.
Evidence of Doge’s role in agency employment and layoffs remains thin, and risks to sensitive data still attract fans of technical expertise across the government, and some accounts still consider and work on It’s a question mark. The code behind a sensitive computer system.
It is also a moving target that explains the specific position of masks in the federal government, and he is initially called a special government employee, like a consultant, and lawyers are the ones who are the administrators of Doge. Not to tell the court. Even agents’ employees.
As it has risen in court to obtain temporary restraining or interim injunctions, for at least now, it is trying to stop mask emissions from accessing personal data at various federal agencies. There is a shortage of lawsuits to do so.
Chukkan’s case from the Attorney General this week shows that broader challenges to mask authority may also struggle in their early stages.
However, the case continues and could potentially be a stronger argument at a later stage, especially as more has emerged from what Doge did.