Tehran – In commentary, the Iranian newspaper discussed the two-day Caspian Economic Forum meeting, hosted by Tehran, attended by officials from five Caspian coastal countries.
The paper not only highlighted its role as a field of cooperation in the Caspian Sea, but also positioned the conference as a potential permanent institution to promote regional economic cooperation. Iran sees the Caspian coast as a gateway to the world economy and can be used to develop ports, maritime transport and regional supply chains. Access to Iran’s Persian Gulf, the Oman Sea and the Caspian Sea offers unique transport capabilities. By creating an attractive North-North International Transport Corridor and establishing a transport link between the Sea of Oman and the Caspian Sea, Tehran can become a hub for the local corridors. This also lays the foundation for a robust communications network that encourages the exchange of goods between the Indian Ocean and the country into the Baltic and Scandinavian regions.
Ham Mihan: Moscow Telan settlement
In the article, Ham Mihan said he will tackle the recent agreement between Iran and Russia and establish a framework for bilateral cooperation over the next 20 years. According to published reports, military components of the agreement include security concerns, joint military exercises and strategic consultations on collaboration within the defense industry. The signature of this document promoted the narrative of a burgeoning coalition aimed at challenging the United States. The strengthening of ties between Iran and Russia grew with the onset of the Syrian civil war, with Russian and Iranian actors coordinated their operations and solidifying their influence in Damascus. However, the agreement emphasizes that the settlement between Russia and Iran extends beyond the relationship defined solely by the Syrian-Ukrainian conflict. It shows specific commitments from both countries to synchronize security policies. Reinforcing this point, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragut has characterized the treaty as a “road map for the future” rather than a “mere political agreement.”
Sobh-e-no: The opposite becomes a dead tree
In a statement, Sobh-e-no highlighted the persistent failures of anti-Iranian groups, saying, “The stigma of the opposition seems endless. However, some of the bankrupt individuals have stuck to adventurism and fantasies. “The statement pointed to support a decline in Europe’s recession over Reza Pahlavi, saying, “Despite the hostile position and ongoing hostilities from European countries to Iran’s Islamic republic, recent events have been disillusioned. The Munich Congress shows an increase in the Dutch Parliament cancelled a joint meeting with him, and even the British refused to acknowledge his audience, troops used within the opposition party made appeals against European countries. Lost it.” Sobh-e-no further commented on his reaction to these set-offs. The remains of the Pallavi regime about a new Western project may have ultimately revealed the fate of these destroyers and opposition figures. Foreign enemy of Iran’s Islamic Republic.
Arman-e-Emrooz: The Ambiguous Future of Iran and Ours
Arman-e-Emrooz spoke about the potential future of Iran and the US involvement. It appears Trump is gradually increasing his pressure and is about to close the route for Iranian oil exports with China. In the meantime, it is unlikely that the Iran-European dialogue will have any particular outcomes, as Europe and the US have no particular differences about Iran. Tehran is likely to seek to prevent the activation of trigger mechanisms by making concessions to European parties and even bilateral talks institutions. However, there is no guarantee that at least one of these parties will not do this by October 18, 2025. Trump now wants to raise political and economic pressures, and threatens war and attacks to achieve the desired outcome. The internal situation in Iran can withstand these extremely difficult economic situations. Therefore, with continued and strengthened sanctions and pressure, internal politics may be the most important challenge facing governments in the future. Overall, it is unlikely that there will be a breakthrough in US-Iran relations over the first two years of President Trump. If negotiations and agreement are reached, this could be the second year.