TEHRAN – In commentary, Ahman et Emuls analyzed Russia’s proposal for mediation between Iran and the US based on Bloomberg’s report on Tuesday.
Russia has agreed to help the Trump administration establish contact with Iran on issues such as Iran’s nuclear program and its regional activities. Trump, who expressed his willingness to reach an agreement with Iran during his campaign and after returning to the White House, said in his message, “I want a verifiable nuclear peace agreement that will allow Iran to grow and develop peacefully.” Iran’s position on nuclear negotiations is clear. It will not negotiate under pressure, and as long as Trump’s maximum pressure is applied, there is no possibility of direct negotiations between Iran and the US on the nuclear issue.
Sharg: Trump’s policy and the uncertainty of Iran’s ambiguous nuclear situation
Sharg argued that Trump’s policy towards Tehran is uncertain. To shed light on the analysis, we look at the views of senior international commentator Pirouz Mousavi. He said: Iran’s issue is once again on the agenda in the new round of the Governor’s Committee’s quarterly meeting, but no progress was made in resolving the differences, and this deadlock exacerbated this deadlock: an increase in 60% enriched uranium reserves, an agency’s unanswered questions, a dispute over the permission of European incisists. Trump’s policy on Iran is based on the biggest pressure strategy, but at the same time he is willing to negotiate a new agreement. In this ambiguous atmosphere, the gap between Europe and the US over Zelensky and the war in Ukraine could increase these complications. If snapback mechanisms are activated and as a result, they are strengthened as a result of sanctions, unless parties are able to activate snapbacks and prevent escalation of the crisis to points out of control through diplomatic initiatives, we may witness a serious crisis in the next three months.
Etterat: Trump’s actions with Zelensky have nothing to do with Iran
Etterat interviewed international affairs expert Ali Bigdeli about the relationship between Trump’s actions against Zelensky and the likelihood of similar actions with Iran. He said: The Ukrainian incident has its complexity due to the widespread influence that could have on relations between Europe and the world. So, when Donald Trump sees the continuation of the situation as a sign of World War II, it can somehow be incredible. The continuation of the current situation deepens and strengthens European hostility towards Russia. The sustainability of the atmosphere of war is not the interests of Europe, not the interests of Ukraine, and certainly not the interests of the world. The negotiations between Iran and Trump and Trump and Zelensky’s conversations are two completely different arguments from contradictory circumstances. Therefore, it is pointless to compare the actions of Iran and the US president towards Zelensky a few days ago. This can only be rooted in the political work of the group, which, despite the damaging nature of their thinking and approach, continues to insist that we do not need dialogue or understanding with the West to solve problems of large and small!
Ham Mihan: Iran is trying to expand its power in the sea
Ham Mihan wrote about the new Iranian warship. Shahid Bagheri’s warships may appear to be technically and structurally inferior to modern aircraft airlines and amphibious attack vessels, but a careful assessment of the ship’s design philosophy shows that Iran has learned lessons from the success of the Yemen Ansarrah and implemented these lessons on a large scale. The Houthi militia demonstrates that Iranian counter-ship missile technology can be used with robotic naval war equipment. Iranian aircraft carriers can cause significant damage to global transport and maritime trade, especially if the Islamic Revolutionary Guard matches Ansarrah. Lessons from Yemen and Ukraine provide valuable real-world knowledge, and traditional weapons control frameworks can hardly stop this threat as Iran diversifies its existing commercial components and logistics networks.