Tehran – In a memo, Hamshali wrote that he is addressing Iran’s lack of concern over the US threat, writing: A review of trends and developments over the last few months and weeks shows that Tehran is not only not concerned about the threat and rhetoric of the Tel Aviv-Washington axis, but also takes effective measures to develop deterrent strategies in a variety of areas.
The way Tehran faces the Washington threat has been one of the most important areas of speculation among Westerners these days. In this situation, the line of analysis of “lack of concern over Iran’s threat” is one of the issues that has attracted attention from Western media and analysts. This problem is more pronounced than it was recently. Various evidence can be presented to prove this. The company’s stance of the country’s senior officials on continuing peaceful nuclear activities and the announcement of new military achievements suggest that such policies, which have been ongoing and continuing in the West over the past decades, have not created a significant obstacle to pursuing the grand strategies envisaged by the Islamic Republic.
Ham Mihan: Iraq is trying to reduce energy dependence on Iran
In his commentary, Ham Mihan wrote: Despite being the second-largest oil producer in OPEC and having large natural gas reserves, Iraq still has problems meeting energy needs such as electricity and natural gas for cooking and heating (due to decades of war and sanctions). One of Iraq’s most important vulnerabilities is its reliance on natural gas and imports of electricity from Iran. Iran itself also faces imbalances in energy production and consumption. Another important issue for Iran is the return of “maximum pressure” from the Trump administration. Sanctions have long made it difficult for Iraq to pay for electricity and gas imports from Iran, and this issue is now in crisis. The goal of Trump’s “maximum pressure” policy is to cut Iran’s oil sales to zero to China and to revoke Iran’s sanctions exemptions, such as investment in Chabahar ports and Iraq’s pressure. If the sanctions exemption from Iran’s gas exports to Iraq has not been extended, alternatives should be looked for.
Siasat-e-Rooz: The Navy Excavates Message to the World
Siasat-e-Rooz dedicated his editor to a naval military exercise jointly held by Iran, China and Russia in the North Indian Ocean. This drill is held while Iranian warships and other equipment are designed and built by Iranian experts. These technological advances have been made under sanctions. This important drill shows a failure of sanctions and serves as a model for countries seeking indigenous security without relying on foreign forces. It should be noted that despite the Western Iranian phobia campaign, the Islamic Republic has always considered the region’s security as its own security and has put a lot of effort into this regard. Given that a significant portion of world trade is being carried out by the ocean, Iran also sought to play an effective role in world trade by pioneering its maritime capacity and ensuring the security of global waterways. The drill sends the world a message that the United States is still an unreliable party in the eyes of these three countries and is willing to abandon its friends in the exchange for American promises in difficult circumstances.
Arman-e-Melli: “Iran’s response to “American claims”
As the leader correctly analyzed, Trump’s claim to send letters to Iran is intended to shape global opinions in a way that the US wants to negotiate and interact with Iran, but it is Iran that solves the problem, relieves tension, and negotiates. However, the leader took a clever attitude towards Trump’s letter, conveying the message that Iran is ready to negotiate but will not tolerate bullying, imposing and tyranny. Without a doubt, we face two categories when it comes to exchanging messages in the media and diplomatic fields. One is the US claim, the other is the Iranian response. It appears that we must properly and strongly utilize our and others’ software powers and present effective and logical responses by convincing global public opinion that negotiation, interaction, peace seeking, and de-extension are rooted in our Islamic and cultural beliefs and that we are the owners of the theory of dialogue between civilisations. So if you like this approach, you can see Trump’s message as a special opportunity and give Iranian response to the claims of Trump and other US authorities that involve threats, bullying and authoritarianism.