Tehran -In a statement that caused a global anger, US President Donald Trump has recently relocated to relocate Palestinians from Gaza to Jordan and Egyptian, and the future of the Fate of Israeli Palestine and the Fate of Palestinian people. Relatulating discussions about.
This proposal has attracted sharp criticisms from local leaders and human rights organizations.
“I want to bring people to Egypt,” said Trump. “You’re probably talking about one and a half millions, so we just clean all of them and say,” You know, it’s over. ” “
Later, Trump praised Jordan for “accepting Palestinian refugees behind the success,” and told King Jordan, “I want to do more.” It is a real confusion. ”
More than 15 months of war in Israeli Gaza evacuated almost all of 2.3 million inhabitants. According to Trump, Gaza residents said, “It may be temporarily or long -term.”
“It’s literally a dismantling site, almost all have been demolished, and people are dying there, so I want to be involved in some Arab countries and build a house in another place.” I said.
The timing of Trump’s remarks is important. Since October 2023, Gaza has been wrapped in a catastrophic war. According to the Gaza Health (January 2025), the Israeli military campaign expelled 1.7 million Palestinians, 75 % of the Gaza population, and killed more than 47,000. The humanitarian crisis is amazing. 80 % of the Gaza people rely on assistance, and the United Nations warns a situation like a hunger amine in a surrounded foot.
Trump’s proposal to relocate Gazan to a neighboring country seems to be another attempt to forcibly drive away many Palestinians, reminiscent of 1948, known as the day of Nagba.
The points worth mentioning in this context are as follows.
1. Trump’s proposal has been consistent with the Government of Israeli’s extreme right Ions, and has long been trying to reduce Palestinian territorial rights. The far -right Israeli Finance Minister, Besarel Smallich, welcomed Trump’s idea of relocating Gaza residents to Egypt and Jordan.
He states in the statement as follows: “The idea of helping them find other places to start a better life is a great idea.”
By defending the dispersion of the population of Gaza, Trump reflects the call from Israel’s hard -line group, which is considered a way to integrate local rule.
2. Trump’s inauguration was characterized by an alienated policy of the Palestinian state, which was an exemplary of the so -called Abraham agreement. Decision. His recent relocation proposals emphasize this approach and prioritize geopolitical reorganization and other regional interests, the Israeli administration, justice, sovereignty, and the Palestinian state.
3. Trump’s rhetoric as a president has strongly consistent with his gospel and parent Israel base, strengthening their belief that unwavering support for Israel is a moral and strategic need. His administration’s policy, including the relocation of the U.S. embassy to Al Kudde, the recognition of Israel’s sovereignty to Golan Heights, and the proposal to forcibly relocate Palestinians to neighboring countries, reflects this commitment. I am. These movements were welcomed not only by his gospel supporters, but also by the influential parent Israeli lobby activity group. By issuing a statement of discussions in discussions and taking the Israeli school, Trump maintains the media, ensures political and financial support from these important constituencies, and among right -wing voters. Try to solidify his position.
Local refusal and legal concerns
Egypt and Jordan clearly refused Trump’s proposal. Just a few hours after Trump’s proposal, Jordan’s Foreign Minister Aiman Safadi said that Anman’s position was a way to achieve peace in the two states.
He emphasized that Jordan’s rejection was unchanged.
Palestine’s Islamic Hard also blamed Trump’s proposal and called the “war crime” encouragement.
Egyptian President Abder Fatta El Cisi warned before the region was unstable by relocating Gazan to Sinai. Jordan, which has already hosted 2.3 million Palestinian refugees, is afraid of further burden on its economy and social structure.
Trump’s proposal clearly violates international law. The 4th Geneva Convention banned the migration of civilians during the war, and the United Nations has accused the UN for potential acts of “ethnic purification”.
Trump’s proposal appeals to his political basis and may match the interests of a specific Israel, but ignore the humanitarian, legal, and geopolitical reality of Israel and Palestine conflicts.
According to the Ministry of Gaza Health, Israel’s military behavior in the past 15 months has led to a considerable number of Palestinians, including a considerable number of children, women, and untrained men. International observers and the United Nations Specials have reported that these businesses have destroyed Gaza’s important infrastructure, and it takes decades to return the area to pre -conflict.
Trump clears a large bomb path to Israel
In recent developments, Trump has raised its previous administration to Israel, about the supply of bombs of 2,000 pounds (907 kg). This is a limit imposed during Joe Biden’s period. This behavior seems to be inconsistent with Trump’s claims on humanitarian intentions on the migration of Palestinians to neighboring countries. Critics argued that the decision to provide such heavy bullets would impair the so -called humanitarian motivation behind the evacuation proposed by the Palestinian.
It is important to recognize that the current situation of Palestine is very different from several decades ago. Today’s Palestinian people have decided not to experience the repeat of NAKBA, which occurred in 1948.