Tehran – In a memo, Hamshari wrote in the negotiations to Araguchi’s warning against the Israelites:
Israel has a long history of sabotage during nuclear negotiations. The Aragut warning came as Iran and the US nuclear talks progressed in Rome and Muscat. Negotiations that could reach a new stage with the launch of expert speeches appear to have raised concerns in Israel. Suffering from the illusion that Iran’s nuclear program poses an existential threat, Israel has a long history of trying to disrupt such consultations. Araghchi’s warnings came due to media speculation about the history of Israeli sabotage, intelligence from Iranian security agencies, and possible movements by Tel Aviv.
Arman-e-Emrooz: The Fateful Saturday for Iranian Diplomacy
Arman-E-Emrooz dedicated the headlines to the start of the third round talk on April 26th. According to the paper, Iranian negotiators arrived at Muscat on Saturday to give a third-round speech with US representatives in the Oman capital. So far, Iran and the US leaders have expressed satisfaction with the talks, but the US Secretary of State recently said Iran must stop enriching uranium and import nuclear fuel from overseas. Iran declared that the right to enrich uranium was unnegotiable, and insisted that it would not retreat. Donald Trump has repeatedly said, “Iran should not obtain nuclear weapons,” and introduced this as his red line, but officials in his administration are still different in detail about the policy. According to Esmail Baghaei, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iran is determined to protect the legal and legitimate rights of people to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and at the same time is ready to take reasonable steps to fully assure the peaceful nature of the nuclear program.
Ettelaat: Purpose of Aragut’s trip to Russia and China during negotiations
Etterat discussed Aragut’s trip to Russia and China by interviewing political expert and former MP Heshmatra Farahatpishe. He said: The main purpose of these trips is to show how difficult it is to negotiate between Iran and the United States. Unfortunately, due to mistakes made in the past, Iran has linked most of its nuclear negotiations with Western and Eastern mediators, but at the will of the Americans it shows that the Eastern mediators, namely China and Russia, are excluded from negotiations, play the role of Western mediators, namely Western mediators, namely, unified, unified states with European Europe. “Snapback mechanism.” During a visit to France, the US Secretary of State asked national officials to operate the stick. Therefore, Americans want Iran to be in a tight spot to score the biggest points. Therefore, Iran is trying to maintain the Eastern parties as supporters of negotiations by making such trips. In the current situation, actions that involve political or economic actions can strengthen Iran’s position.
Shargh: Another step
In his analysis, Shargh tackles Araghchi’s proposal to resume diplomacy with Europe, writing: The proposal to negotiate with the European troika can be analysed from two perspectives. First, the proposal could be a sign of Tehran’s concerns about European troikas that activate snapback mechanisms. In any case, snapback mechanisms that can automatically recover international sanctions are a serious threat to Iran. Aragci’s proposal to negotiate and travel to European capitals may be a strategic attempt to open the door to dialogue to discourage London, Berlin and Paris from taking action with Iran at the conference. Second, Araguchi’s proposal could be interpreted as a continuation of Iran’s policy of de-escalation with the West, which was recently observed in interactions with the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency. After working with Washington and working with the agency, Iran may want to extend this approach to ties with the European troika. Araguchi’s reference to successful consultations in Moscow and Beijing and preparation for a trip to Europe indicate an attempt to create a broader diplomatic framework.