Tehran – In a memo, Jammu et Jammu discussed Qatar’s chief of visit to Iran, saying:
Regarding the speculation that Katalis is mediating between Iran and the United States, it should be said that Iran has repeatedly emphasized that we are not violating the principles of negotiations, but negotiations are respected on an equal footing. It must be done to represent. Negotiations are pointless under sanctions. In negotiations, it should be noted that the Islamic Republic will undoubtedly demand rejected rights from the Iranian people, and have demands from Iran as they break the promise, waive the negotiations and put pressure on them. It should be noted that it is not in the West. Iran. Those who are trying to increase economic pressure on people must be accountable. Travels like travel by Qatar’s chief, especially during Trump’s second presidential term, is an opportunity for the whole world to once again witness the strength and power of resistance of the Iranian people and the revelation of the Western miscalculation.
Sazandegi: Qatar, another mediator
In the article, Southern Degi treats Qatar as a mediator in negotiations between Iran and the United States, writing: That this country is still intending to resolve other conflicts. In this respect, it should be noted that Joe Biden has given Qatar the title of “non-NATO major alley.” Now, in addition to deepening Tehran-Doha relations, we should probably wait for Catalis to demonstrate positive behaviorism if it relates to Iran. There is speculation that Qatar’s chief may have brought a message to Iran from the west, as Qatar had previously served as an intermediary between Iran and the United States. Iranian Foreign Minister Arakich did not confirm or deny the news. Of course, it should be noted that Iranian channels between Oman and Switzerland are active.
Iran: Regional conditions will change the game courtesy of Iran
In the analysis, the Iranian newspaper discusses changing conditions in the region, writing: The current condition facing the axis of resistance is not the endpoint. Furthermore, changes in US and Israeli regional conditions and policies that have created tension and anxiety have not vanished the main basis for continuing resistance thinking, and resistance is considered a necessity for the region. . Despite the damages, despite the axis of resistance has been hit, Iran has not changed its regional policy and is its main supporter. Political developments over the past few weeks have conveyed a large number of messages from Syria, even the need and need for cooperation with Iran on the regional security architecture. In this situation, Iran has numerous role-play dynamics that can be analyzed and investigated at three levels. And the larger Mediterranean region.
Arman-e-Melli: Europe’s willingness to negotiate with Iran
In an interview with Qasem Moheb-Ali, a former diplomat and international affairs analyst, Arman-e-Melli looked into Iran’s approach to Europe and the United States. He said: To predict the actions of Europeans towards post-conflict Iran in the Russian-Ukraine, we must first look at how and when this complicated war will end. Of course, Iran must act very intellectually in such circumstances. Before the Russian-US agreement ends, the Islamic Republic must reach an agreement with Europeans and Americans to protect its interests. While Europeans are certainly interested in hitting deals with Iran, they have always shown that they cannot design and succeed in planning without US support. In this context, it must be said that Iran also must compromise with the US in the course of negotiations, as Europe is not currently strong enough to make independent decisions.