President Tehran – Masoud Pezeshkian’s Penn may have tracked the outline of Iranian breaks at facilities that are increasingly seen as geopolitical sabotage rather than as guardians.
On Wednesday, the Iranian president officially enacted a “law that requires the government to halt cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).”
This is not just a bureaucratic pause. Tehran’s declaration means that Director Rafael Grossi’s IAEA has abandoned its fair mantle to become a combination of intelligence reporting equipment equipped by the Israeli regime, where the US and Israeli regimes compete against Iran.
What the law requires
The law requires an immediate “suspension of all cooperation” with the IAEA, implemented under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the related protection agreements.
This step is a direct response to “a violation of national sovereignty and territorial integrity and territorial integrity by the Iranian regime and the United States of America, through attacks on Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities.”
Importantly, a halt may not correspond to a permanent departure. As Ebrahim Azitzi, chair of the Congressional National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, details, cooperation remains frozen until two non-negotiable conditions are met.
I. Guaranteed Security: Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) should verify the absolute security recovery of the country’s nuclear facilities and the scientists who run them – a shield against further attacks.
ii. Basic IAEA reform: Institutions must undergo demonstrable transformations, end discriminatory practices and clearly recognize Iran’s inevitable rights in international law, particularly Article IV of the IAEA Act.
In an interview on Tuesday, Azitzi stressed the gravity, saying, “How can we prepare a biased political report and work with organizations that ignore Iran’s inherent rights? The agency must act within the framework of international law against Iran, without discrimination.
The law further provides that “action or omission leading to a violation of this law is considered a crime and punished.”
The national rage has been codified
The journey of law reflects a nation in which the nation is shaken from betrayal and imposed war.
After the Israeli regime launched a war with Iran on June 13, and then bombed US civilian nuclear sites that were not provoking Iran’s civilian sites in Natanz, Fordau and Isfahan on June 22, the brave escalation targeted commanders, scientists and civilians.
The bill introduced in the “double emergency” was a direct response to the attacks and the role of the IAEA in making them possible.
On June 25th, the bill was voted in Iran’s parliament. Reflecting national consensus and rage, it was overwhelming, and perhaps passed with unanimous support.
The legislative process went swiftly, and the Guardian Council, Iran’s constitutional watchdog, reviewed and approved the law the following day.
This rapid ratification highlighted the Tehran perception of deep trust. The enactment of President Pezeschkian on July 2 was the final and decisive seal of the legislative breakwater.
The IAEA’s descent
Tehran’s terrible indictment paints a picture of an agency that devastated its mission. Core assertions are strict. Particularly under Director Rafael Grossi, the IAEA has transformed into a dual purpose tool of spy and political coercion that serves the agendas of Washington, Tel Aviv, London, Paris and Berlin. This change is evident in a destructive chain of behavior.
I. Reports politicized as an excuse
Glossy may report on Iran, but later in an interview with CNN, the IAEA admitted that “there are no evidence or indication that Iran’s nuclear program is heading for weaponization,” but was concluded with ambiguity and unconfirmed claims.
Iranian officials, including Foreign Minister Abbas Aragut, have argued that this was intentional. Condemns such blatant violations of the IAEA Safeguard and its law. ”
This June 12th, the BOG resolution promoted by E3 (UK, France, Germany) and the US became diplomatic fig leaves for the attack.
ii. Allow war through omission and action
Tehran sees a direct line from the flawed reports of Grossi and the swamp’s resolution to subsequent military attacks.
The Israeli strike on June 13th and the US bombardment on June 22nd were not only violations of international law and the UN Charter, but also, in Iran’s view, were physical manifestations of the process that the IAEA made possible.
Seriously, Grossi’s refusal to condemn these brave attacks on protected facilities – a serious violation of the agency’s protection agreement and law would implicitly approve approval and conspiracy to attack him.
Esmaeir Bakai, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, clearly stated the depth of his betrayal. “We had modest expectations from the IAEA and the swamps to clearly condemn the US attacks on peaceful nuclear facilities in Israel and America.
This follows the formal communications atomic energy organization that denies Grossi for the formal communications of Iran (AEOI) Head Mohamad Eslami.
iii. After Attack Access: Masquerade Spy as a Safeguard.
Iran sees with deep doubt and vigilance at its immediate demand for access to Grossi’s bombed location.
Framed as needed for validation of the Safeguard, Tehran deciphers these requests as thinly blocked intelligence report collection missions for the highly invaders who performed the strike.
Based on Grossi’s past performance, the objectives seem calm and clear.
– Invader Damage Assessment: Provides the US and Israel with a detailed ground assessment of the effectiveness of their strikes – the important intelligence they currently lack.
Despite boasting from numbers like President Donald Trump claims the site has been “eliminated,” the US and Israeli intelligence agencies face black holes about actual damage, as leaked to stenographers pretending to be journalists for CNN and The New York Times. IAEA access helps to assess the extent of damage reported to invaders.
– Uranium Hunt: Discovered the current location of Iran’s highly enriched uranium (HEU). Identifying this material is a top priority for Western and Israeli intelligence agencies that have decided to stop Iran’s civil nuclear program.
– Intel’s targets for future strikes: Collect granular intelligence on Iran’s reconstructed civil nuclear program (its vulnerabilities, new locations, defensive measures) to promote future plans for future military action.
So, from an Iranian perspective, granting access to the same organisation that actively promoted recent unprovoked artillery fire has led to inviting the very spies who coordinated the attacks and inviting them to future attacks on your critical civil infrastructure.