LONDON – Again, Ansalala proves that, whether it’s in the Yemeni scene, an influential force that cannot be ignored when creating new maps of the region, within the framework of resistance that redrawn the regional competitive equations.
What was previously considered a local rebel movement with tribal or sectarian character has now become a military and political force that can impose new realities that affect regional and international security equations beyond Yemen’s boundaries. These transformations did not emerge out of nowhere, but are the natural consequences of a long road to conflict and adaptation to pressure, the result of strategic developments in which Ansalala can transform from a siege group in the mountains of Sada to players from major regional players that could threaten international voyage routes, and employ sensitive targets in thousands of kilometres.
When Ansalala decided to enter the equation of regional deterrence in favor of the Palestinians by targeting Zionist enemy voyages in the Red Sea, it was not merely a tactical move or response to temporary situations, but an extension of a strategic approach based on a clear vision within the framework of comprehensive conflict with the Zeonist Project.
The messages carried by Ansarallah’s military operations were multi-level. On the one hand, the Sanaa leadership movement and its allies confirmed that the era of absolute hegemony in the Red Sea was over and the Israeli movement in the region was no longer safe. Meanwhile, vulnerabilities in the security system revealed that the US and its allies in the region have long been promoted.
Support for Iran’s resistance (which was limited to Ansala and media and political initiatives due to the type of total shutdown imposed on Sanaa) was part of a comprehensive strategy aimed at creating a new balance of regions that redrawn the line of involvement between Geoniest and the US projects, as well as traditional support based on military and logistical support.
In this context, the relationship between Tehran and Ansalala was built not only on ideological loyalty to the Palestinian cause, but also on a practical foundation based on a common interest and a unified vision for the future of the region. Ansalala has found strategic allies that will allow them to strengthen their regional status in Iran despite their independence in political and military decision-making.
Since the initiative to support Gaza after the Al-Aqsa flood operation, resistance in the region has been converted into an interconnected system that has expanded from Gaza to Damascus to Sanaa, Baghdad to Tehran, although it is no longer limited to specific geography. The system has successfully imposes new engagement rules that prevent enemies from performing aggressive manipulation without facing multiple aspects of painful reactions.
What’s happening today in the Red Sea is not just a show of force, but part of this system that seeks to force Zionist entities to pay a heavy price for all offensive policies, whether in Palestine or at other points in the region.
The war with Yemen, initially aimed at shattering Ansalala and returning it to square, has turned into a great opportunity to allow them to develop their capabilities and expand their influence. The coalition that led the war brought direct support from America and Britain, and did not realize that the war they thought was quick and swift would turn into a quagmire that would drain their capabilities and reshape the balance of power in the region.
Traditionally considered merely a field of marginal conflict, Yemen is today a strategic axis that can threaten international navigation security and directly influence the cube equations with Zionist groups.
The United States, which has long considered the Red Sea to be a strategic passage protected by regional alliances, has found itself facing an unprecedented dilemma. Attempts to mobilize the United Nations to confront the threat of Ansala have not achieved the desired outcome, not just because of the military challenges it faces, but also because of the complex political equations imposed by the new reality.
In light of this reality, Iran has emerged as a major player in reshaping its regional strategy as well as supporting resistance. Tehran has become a direct party to the conflict not only through allies as the enemy promoted, but also through logistical and technical support against resistance, or through political and diplomatic entities that have managed to create a network of international partnerships that restrict the movement of the US and Zionists.
Proven to be effective in multiple arenas, this strategy places Zionist entities and their allies in unprecedented predicament, and although they no longer have the ability to end the battle decisively in the way they are used to, they are now fighting an expansionary war that drains resources and weakens hegemony.
Resistance has become a force in all its components that can now impose new reality, not merely a response to attack. The operations carried out by Ansarallah are part of an integrated strategy aimed at changing the power equations in the region, as well as random responses.
What is happening today in the Red Sea is an example of the major changes that conflict witnesses, with technology superiority alone no longer sufficient to achieve victory, and will, immobility and ability to adapt to variables have become a critical factor in determining the course of conflict.
There is no doubt that the future is not the case. And Zionist entities, accustomed to impose that hegemony with force, now face unprecedented challenges that force them to rethink their strategies. Ansalala, like Hezbollah, Hamas and Iraqi factions, have become part of an interconnected system of resistance that shares information and tactics and manages conflicts with different mentalities than before. The system has managed to turn weaknesses into sources of strength, and now holds initiatives on multiple fronts, pregnant with surprises that could fundamentally change the equation of conflict.
Today’s battle is not just a battle of weapons, but a battle of will and strategy. The Zionist entities, which have long relied on military superiority and absolute Western support, now face new reality that they had never expected. The axis of resistance, which was considered a group of scattered factions, has today become a cohesive local force where the words can be imposed. What is happening today in the Red Sea is just a new chapter in a long battle that is not yet over, but is closer than ever to achieving strategic changes that could redraw the map of influence across the region.