Mainstream voices have changed the sheets of the song.
After a year and a half deafening silence and merciless effort to trust all the voices critical of Israel’s extinction and the war of genocide in Palestine, liberal conservative forces have begun to tweet faint condemnations of what they can no longer deny.
French President Emmanuel Macron declared that “the humanitarian situation in Gaza is unbearable.”
Guardian and Dutch Records The NRC newspaper finally reports what Palestinians and genocide experts have told the world since the beginning of Israel’s latest massacre. Genocide is genocide.
The faint acceptance of genocide is more desirable than silence and accomplice, and such statements should be welcomed until a complete and complete ban on genocide is available in Palestine or anywhere else.
But at the same time, we need to investigate the intentions and effects of such admissions and condemnations to see whether they truly represent human rediscovery.
The European voice chorus began to condemn Israel’s extinction war in Palestine, but their rhetoric has not been translated into action
The simultaneity of these accusations and similar registrations suggest the degree of consistency between the government and the founding media. This does not rule out the real awakening and some kind of noble domino effect in the unbearable reality of radical evil that we all suffered.
After all, speaking encourages others to do the same thing. Expecting others who admit that they can no longer deny something as bad as genocide may force people to switch sides and avoid doing so at the end.
However, this sudden turn raises questions after nearly 20 months of silence or manufactured impotence researched in the face of live-streamed genocide.
European co-convicts
Some argue that this tone change is too modest and too rated attempt to clear the legacy of European accomplices in the Israeli massacre.
Gaza undoubtedly, Israel has dropped over 100,000 tonnes of explosives on its population of 2 million. As author Omar el Akkad said, “One day everyone will oppose this” – reminding us that people tend to find courage on the right side of history only if they are no longer involved in saying the right thing or doing the right thing.
It is possible that this day has come, except that Gaza’s genocide is still ongoing and that, as Israeli critics, especially the EU institutions and governments, do nothing to stop it, this day may have come, except that it is still ongoing and expanding towards the West Bank.
It’s exactly the opposite. They still support genocide politically, economically and militarily. In short, we are similarly witnessing sudden language changes without sudden policy changes.
Importantly, this rhetorical conversion occurs the moment the European masses stopped purchasing the genocide Hasbara, “self-defense” and “demilitarization of Hamas.”
It cannot be ruled out that founding forces within the European Union are trying to restore Israel’s monopoly in criticism to neutralize the criticism that has progressed through a global movement of solidarity with the Palestine. Israeli Settlers – Exposing the colonialism and apartheid structures of Israeli Settlers, with the exception of the central role of Tel Aviv, based on the expansion of the world economic system based on the expansion of the world economic system based on the expansion of military capabilities.
The criticism of this ideological issue is that the EU’s establishment targets its target by appearing to ease their control over how it can be criticized for violations of Israel’s fundamental norms.
The ti-sick distance of some EU states from the “Netanyahu government” is an attempt to superpersonalize the responsibility of genocide, and to protect the colonial infrastructure of settlers that allows it – if you park the only terms of trade with Israel, it is the only important way, so for the trade with Israeli Thailand, it has become a mere review, not just a review, but a mere review.
War machine
The founding forces are tempting them to focus on measures that will almost certainly not pass, as the suspension of the agreement would require unanimous agreements in all 27 EU states, including Israel’s solid allies such as Germany and Hungary.
The EU state unilaterally provides unconditional support for Israel’s war of extinction, and can be withdrawn in the same way.
They did not pursue a multilateral road to support Israel for the same reasons they are pursuing a multilateral road to approve it – because it doesn’t work when prompt response is needed.
Thus, multilateral selection in the EU will help to divert the growing public pressure to do something about the acceleration of Gaza’s genocide.
Established forces remotely discussing the possibility of unilateral measures similar to those adopted in response to Russia’s war of attack on Ukraine since February 2022, have seen nowhere to encourage arms embargo, unilateral trade freezes and research to sever ties with institutions that enable machinery of war.
There is a simple way to identify whether these sudden transformations are the final attempt at revival control over public thoughts regarding Palestinian genocide – given that it is no longer possible to deny genocide – or the first step to end the EU’s accomplices of ongoing atrocities.
If these voices call for urgent and concrete measures to stop both EU genocide and accomplice, we need to welcome their support and use it to ganize more people in large numbers, end genocide and address its structural causes.
But if these sudden accusations are limited to acknowledging what is no longer denied without supporting measures to combat the immunity of genocide, we must deal with them as to what they are: dangerous attempts by the accomplices of the Israeli massacre preempt the social opposition they must ultimately consider after tomorrow.
Therefore, we must neutralize the ongoing effect of digging on Gaza’s Palestinians and condemn the efforts to return to business as usual, as if nothing had happened. This allows for the power of the same institution that allowed us to continue to safely exercise the power of privilege to respect how genocide lives our lives and communicates correctly what we are wrong.
Marina Kalkari is an assistant professor of international relations at Leiden University. She specializes in political violence in the Middle East and focuses on the armed resistance movement, particularly Hezbollah’s ideology and strategy. Her current project explores how states and non-state actors negotiate the vision of global society in an age of global sorting.
Gjovalin Macaj is an assistant professor of UN Studies in Peace and Justice at Leiden University. He holds a Dphil in human rights from Oxford University and holds a PhD in European Foreign Policy from the University of Brussels. His research focuses on human rights, ethics, norms, diplomacy, the theory and practice of the European Union and the United Nations.
(Source: Middle Eastern Eye)