BEIRUT – The Lebanese military and its leader, Samir Gigea, is obsessed with monitoring the potential impact of successful or failure in negotiations between Washington and Tehran, fearing that positive outcomes will hinder “achievement” on the resistance movement. This is reflected in an organized campaign conducted by the Lebanese army against President Joseph Own.
Samir Geagea believes the success of the agreement will benefit Iran’s regional allies, particularly Hezbollah. Among other things, they fear unprecedented activities by Hezbollah to reconstruct the structures and capabilities they thought were destroyed by the recent US-led Israeli invasion.
In fact, Lebanese military parties suffer tensions with local political wings, waiting closely for the outcome of new negotiations between Washington and Tehran, and are also disappointed by Lebanese military rhetoric that suggests that Lebanon is returning to a time of civil war.
The Lebanese military party views the American and Israeli projects in West Asia as perfectly consistent with its undivided vision. This retroactively revives resistance from the Israeli Pro Project in the early 1980s, promotes the Neo-Sykes Picot Project, promotes the Neo-Sykes Picot Project, and calls for revenge.
Geagea’s role is clearly to fuel Lebanon’s sectarian struggles by sequestering Lebanese Shiites as well as fueling Lebanese sectarian struggles.
Therefore, future parliamentary elections (scheduled for May 2026) represent the opportunity for Lebanese forces to form an alliance that will lead to the seizure of at least one of the 27 Shia parliamentary seats.
Sources reveal that after Nawaf Al-Salam failed due to a lack of diplomatic experience, Riyadh is supporting the next government by supporting Geagea candidate MP Fouad Makhzoumi.
From now on to the Congressional elections, Geagea will be busy thwarting efforts to reconstruct what was destroyed by the US-led Lebanon invasions from September November to November, especially those destroyed by Hezbollah’s service agencies.
The Lebanese army recently abolished a draft aimed at rebuilding the homes destroyed by the occupation regime, and aimed at laws aimed at exempting Nabatier and the cities and villages in the south from water, electricity bills and fines.
So far, it does not appear that the so-called international community will provide reconstruction aid if the Lebanese government is not compliant with the conditions of the US and Saudi leaders.
Meanwhile, various experts have confirmed that Lebanon’s Treasury Ministry holds a large sum of money in the Lebanon Central Bank, which can contribute to compensation for those affected by the Israeli invasion.
Moreover, the government has circumvented its responsibility to form a national reconstruction organisation, and has not taken on local initiatives both inside and outside Lebanon, engaged with wealthy Lebanese people, and provided partial funding for funds overseen by the body itself.
This is consistent with obstruction of foreign aid from Iran and Iraq.