Beirut – The commemoration of the first anniversary of the martialism of Said Hassan Nasrara served as a pivotal moment of resistance to recalibrate internal dynamics.
The anniversary came amid a major regional change as Washington is committed to supporting Israel and views the ceasefire of the Gaza War as a temporary rest before the wider battle.
Meanwhile, it is clear that Tel Aviv has yet to achieve its goal of eliminating what is called “Iranian agent.”
US envoy Thomas Barrack has made it clear that Israel is prepared for military action against Hezbollah and that the party is heading towards what is called the “new revival” by reorganizing its ranks, restoring its civilian environment, and restoring concerns about Washington and Tel Aviv.
The concerns escalated after Prime Minister Nawaf Salam’s government failed to implement Washington Tel Aviv’s demands to disarm the resistance, prompting the West and Israelis to believe that Israel alone could achieve their mission.
On his part, Sayyed Abdul-Malik Al-Houthi, leader of the Yemeni Ansala movement, stressed that Hezbollah’s weapons and Gaza were major obstacles to occupation, warning that he was drawn into America and Israel.
Sayyed Al-Houthi emphasized that Lebanese resistance is not only one, but part of an integrated axis!
It is noteworthy that Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the UN strengthened Israel’s long-term strategy. This is what we consider Hezbollah as a central obstacle to a project to conquer the region.
Netanyahu linked the achievements of “peace” to the dismantling of resistance and hinted at options that would lead to a civil war in Lebanon. He showed that victory over Hezbollah and Hamas was a condition for expanding Abraham’s agreement.
However, Netanyahu implicitly acknowledged that the outcome of the war had not achieved its desire and that resistance remained a cornerstone that hampered Israel’s hegemony.
Without a doubt, Hezbollah played a fundamental role under the leadership of Saeednasrara, particularly after the victory in May 2000, in reshaping the alternative geopolitical spaces in West Asia.
Martyr said Nasrallah not only provided military support, but also created a local environment that brought the Palestinian cause back to the forefront.
After his martialism, resistance demonstrated the flexibility to deal with Joseph Own’s election as president and the appointment of Nawaf Salam as prime minister. However, it established a strategic red line and thwarted the enemy’s attempts to drag Lebanon into internal conflicts.
He also flexibly cooperated with the Lebanese army in implementing Resolution 1701, but emphasized that compliance with it was a coincidence at the end of the Israeli attack.
Conversely, resistance maintained silence and ambiguity about the restructuring of military power, increasing the uncertainty of the enemy.
Therefore, Netanyahu’s speech, the leaks of America, and the status of Said Al Hauc and Iranian officials all reveal that Hezbollah remains the most influential player in the regional equation. Despite its military superiority, Israel was unable to break the balance imposed by resistance, and simply tried to reestablish hegemony by talking about “peace.”
The region is currently facing long tests and Hezbollah remains the biggest stumbling block for American and Israeli projects.