BEIRUT – Lebanese military leader Samir Giagea continues to prioritize the slogan “disarm Hezbollah” following the decline in the influence of US envoys, particularly on the Lebanese political landscape.
At the same time, Geagea often expresses his annoyance towards President Joseph Aoun’s rational approach on the issue, accusing him of “overly fearing civil war.”
“If the Lebanese state disarms an armed faction, this is not considered a civil war, rather it is a natural action the state took to expand into all its territory,” Geagea said.
What Geagea and his ministers are saying failed to achieve something remarkable.
He fears missed opportunities ahead of the May 2026 parliamentary elections, so Geagea misused the slogan of disarming resistance as propaganda, and may not hesitate to resign from government work for Lebanon’s enemy and impose the pastor to confuse him.
The anti-resist fact actively promotes the narrative of Lebanon shaking the brink of the Civil War and refusing to Hezbollah to abandon the weapons needed to protect the country. “There is a reality that needs to be fixed. Anyone who violates “illegal weapons,” must be jailed. ”
Meanwhile, the government has concluded an agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to establish a so-called “representative office for residents in Lebanon.”
The agreement grants employees extensive privileges and immunity, including illegal exemptions from taxes and duties. Unlimited right to buy and sell gold and currency. Immunization from state testing, confiscation or arrest.
This non-Yoking agreement exposes Western reform claims because it has not received Congressional approval to undermine the remainder of its sovereignty. If some Lebanon believe that these alleged reforms are designed to serve the Lebanese people, then they are delusional.
As Thomas Barrack repeatedly claims he met in Beirut, Lebanon is not given free hand as he has repeatedly advocated that he will put a lot of pressure on Lebanon by the end of the month, especially after the failed US and Israeli invasions on Iran.
During his recent visit, Barrack reportedly listened to the staff’s comments and explained that ongoing attacks, preventing the return of border village residents and obstructing reconstruction were issues complicating the challenges of disarming Hezbollah.
Sources make clear that the barracks will try to persuade Israel to convince Lebanon that something is changing, and strive to stop the daily violation of Lebanese sovereignty. He was honest in admitting that the war had not stopped at all, even if it was being fought by one party.
When asked to be surprised by his claims about throwing a ball of fire at Lebanese officials, he replied: “The complete halt of the war with Gaza without a wide, solid, stable agreement with Iran will be difficult to reach a solution in Lebanon.”
Anyone who imagines Washington’s policy in this region will preserve people’s rights and interests is naive. Remember how American negotiator Witkoff was recently treated when he was promoting an imminent agreement. Israel began a war with the Iranian people before Washington joined.
Since the announcement of the massive Lebanese SO in 1920, the country continues to be subject to foreign headquarters, starting with the Egyptian-American Agreement, which ended the 1958 crisis and ended the 2024 suspension agreement.
Also, remember that Israel’s first Israeli Prime Minister, Ben Gurion, once said, “Lebanon is a historical and geographical error and this mistake must be removed and corrected.”
This was before the establishment of Hezbollah, when the environment that encouraged resistance projects had to be alienated and deprived of its most basic living services.
The late Sayad Abdul Hussein Sharaf al-Din, the great founder of Lebanon’s resistance, is explained in a letter to then-president President Bechala El-Kowri. The ability to protect it, you will certainly fail to protect your own story, and the entire Lebanon. ”
Sayyed Sharaf Al-Din’s words reveal the historical extent to which oppression historically conferred on tolerance capabilities has been historically conferred since the establishment of Zionist organizations.
The issue at its core is the extreme and inexpensive predisposition of anti-resistance teams, including Geagea, who has become accustomed to praise foreign power in exchange for humiliating grants from a handful of people.
Those who constantly defended us with stories of reform and prosperity have forgotten that Israel is manipulating them.
The battle is as follows: To become an honorable resistance or humiliating mercenary. The nation that wastes their guarantees of dignity and strength have been drowning in the sea of humiliation and dishonor for humiliation and dishonor.
This honorable culture of life is enshrined by Imam Ali (AS). He said: “If you give up, you’re still alive and dead.
