In a letter written to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Sunday, Iran’s top diplomats called on the UN Security Council to recognize the Israeli regime and the United States as initiators of liability, including compensation and compensation for recent invasions against Iran and subsequent liability.
This is a reminder of the UN Security Council (UNSC) of the need to fulfill its key responsibility to maintain international responsibility, according to a letter on June 13, 2025 (S/2025/379) regarding the offensive conduct of the Islamic regime against the Islamic Republic of Iran from June 13, 2025 to June 24, 2025. This is a reminder of the UN Security Council (UNSC) of the need to fulfill its primary responsibility to maintain international responsibility.
Since the Israeli attack on the Islamic Republic began on June 13, 2025, Article 2, paragraph 4 of the UN Charter, many residential areas, civilians and civil infrastructure have been deliberately targeted, making it a top Iranian violation of international law.
As the full extent of the damage is still being assessed, several hospitals and relief centres have been targeted, a serious violation of international humanitarian law, and some energy facilities have been attacked with the aim of disrupting the daily lives of civilians.
Nuclear facilities under the strict supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the cities of QOM, Arak, Natanz and Isfahan are considered as attacks by the Israeli regime and the United States, a total violation of the UN Charter, a treaty on the non-nutritional nature of nuclear weapons (NPT), and an IAAEA treaty.
Below is the full text of his letter.
In the name of God, the most compassionate and most merciful
Your Honor,
In accordance with the letters on attacks involving acts of aggression committed by the Israeli regime against the Republic of Iran from June 13, 2025 to June 13, 2025 to June 24, 2025, and other related communications, I am writing to replicate the need for performance by maintaining responsibility through the maintenance of international responsibility.
Since the Islamic regime’s attack on the Republic of Iran was launched on June 13, 2025, serious violations of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, as well as many residential buildings, civilians and civil infrastructure have been deliberately targeted in blatant violations of international law. Although full-scale losses have been evaluated, several hospitals and relief centres have been targeted for serious violations of international humanitarian law, while several energy installations aim to disrupt the daily lives of civilians, and IAEA Safede nuclear facilities have become the target of Israeli attacks. IAEA instruments and their resolutions.
These unilateral attacks on Iran violate many basic rules of international law, including:
– Right of life under Article 6 of the International Contract on Civil and Political Rights.
– UN Charter and customary international law (International Prohibition on the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) (1970) (1970): Declaration on the Principles of International Law on Friendship with the Status of Jus Cognes).
– Prohibition on attacks (General Assembly Resolution 3314 (xxix) (1974): Definition of attacks);
– Non-intervention obligations in domestic affairs in another state (General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) (1970): Declaration on the principles of international law regarding friendship relations).
– The obligation to respect the sovereignty of another nation. and
– The rights of the Iranian people to self-determination under Article 1(2) of the United Nations Charter and the international contracts regarding civil and political rights and the common article 1(1) of the international contracts regarding economic, social and cultural rights.
Following the attack, a considerable number of UN member states, regional and international organizations condemned the attacks and attacks in powerful language, and were recognized as a serious violation of the UN Charter through the Non-Allied Movement (NAM), including the Communique (NAM) on June 13, 2025, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) through the statement on June 17, 2025, and through the BRICS statement through the BRICS statement. State through the Statement of the PGCC Statement through the PGCC Statement through the PGCC Statement. Furthermore, the Islamic cooperation organization strongly condemned the invasion through its resolution on June 22, 2025.
In particular, this is the minimum requirement for the rule of law at the international level, but considering the obligation to be unrecognised for violations of the ruthless norms of international law, it is mandatory to the UN Security Council to fulfill its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security entrusted under Article 24(1) of the Claimant.
Therefore, and in the current context, in order to have an effect on the provisions of the Charter, and in light of the fact that the Security Council, in accordance with Article 39, exists, the Security Council demands that the Security Council demand a unified, unified, unified, favor, in view of the fact that the Israeli regime’s integration of Islam and territorial integrity, exists, and the existence of an attack on the integration of Iraq’s unified integration. Attack and subsequent liability and compensation. The Security Council should also prevent the recurrence of such heinous and serious crimes in order to be accountable to invaders and to maintain international peace and security. It is important to note that political and military leaders ordering acts of aggression are also individually liable for crimes of international attack under customary international law.
Furthermore, acts of attack are a brave attack on the very foundations of international law, allowing that same, emphasizing that its legal consequences seriously undermine the credibility of the United Nations system, poses a real threat to the rules of law at the international level, and condemns the future laws of the region and the international community.
If you are circulating the current letter as a general assembly and the security board document, I should be grateful.
I hope you will accept my best considerations, Your Excellency.
MA/6515452