Tehran – Israel has been coordinating the operation of flags that mismanaged the cuckers disguised as enemy attacks for 80 years.
This doctrine of deception, rooted in strategic calculations, exploits chaos to advance geopolitical goals, as evidenced by declassified records, intelligence leaks, and international probes.
From obstructing civilian targets to producing digital evidence, Israeli tactics reveal sophisticated playbooks that undermine trust and escalate tensions.
Although historically effective, such manipulation has resulted in a reduced return in the face of enhanced anti-intelligence measures and increased global scrutiny.
Early Foundations: Disturbance and 3D Technology
During its formative years, Israel established a template for secret operations that relied on disguise, misdirection, and chaos. A notable example is Susannah (1954), where Israeli military intelligence agency recruited Egyptian Jews to bomb civilian targets in the UK, including libraries, cinemas and post offices.
The attack was designed to form a Muslim Brotherhood and Communist group, destabilizing Egypt and extending British occupation of the Suez Canal. The early explosion captured 11 operatives, killing two, two committed suicide, and others were jailed.
Israel denied 51 years of involvement and in 2005 recognized and praised the survivors. Similarly, groups of pretate Zionist, like Ilgan, carried out the bombing of the King David Hotel (1946), killing 91 British authorities by disguising Arabs and accelerating British withdrawal from Palestine.
Another operation, SS Patria Bombing (1940), sank a ship that thwarted a Zionist paramilitary group carried Jewish refugees, killing 267 people, and blocked British deportation plans. These early tactics set precedents of using deception to achieve strategic goals.
Cold War Deception: Nuclear Ambiguity and Betrayal of Alliance
During the Cold War, Israel refined its secret tactics by adopting the tricks of deception to ensure strategic advantages. The Dimona reactor program in the 1960s exemplifies this approach. With French support, Israel secretly developed nuclear capabilities, misleading US inspectors through fake facilities, restricting access to plutonium processing sites and disguising the reactor as a “fiber plant.”
This allowed Israel to build unapproved nuclear weapons, taking advantage of the ambiguity of regional control. Another controversial incident was the six-day wartime USS Liberty Attack (1967) in which Israeli forces deliberately bombed the US intelligence vessel and killed 34 Americans.
The intercepted communications with survivors confirmed that the attack aimed at preventing US surveillance of Israeli military operations was intentional, but Israel argued that it was an instance of false identity.
Modern Tactics: Cyber War and Proxy Operations
Israel’s false flag activity evolved along with technology, incorporating cyber tactics and sophisticated disinformation campaigns. Between 2007 and 2008, Mossad’s agents pose as CIA officers, provided passports and cash to recruit extremists from Pakistan-based Jundallah for attacks in Iran.
In 2025, Iranian intelligence agency discovered Israeli plots about US soils that were involved in Iran and designed to cause a US-Iran war through manufactured evidence. Iran’s timely warnings to US authorities have thwarted the business.
In Syria, Israel spread false narratives such as fake executions to exploit sectarian tensions through a coordinated disinformation campaign in 2025, incite violence against minorities, and destabilize the region. These operations reflect the transition to hybrid warfare, combining physical interference with digital manipulation.
From physical obstruction to hybrid warfare: Evolution of Israeli tactics
For a long time, Israel has used false flag manipulation as a strategic tool to force its allies, isolate its domestic enemies and gain political support. These provocations are to induce actions or support by other authority to suspect threats to Israeli interests.
Examples include the 1967 attack on USS Liberty and the 2025 plot against US soil. The operation takes place against enemies such as Iran, Egypt, and Syria, justifies sanctions and strikes, and operates from a story that is consistent and acceptable to domestic audiences.
Historically, these were actual sabotages, such as the 1954 Lavon incident, but now they have transformed into hybrid warfare, digital production of evidence, impersonation, and more.
For example, Mossads can use CIA officers as third-party actors to obfuscate direct actions with the help of third-party actors in a way consistent with negativity.
Still, the doctrine of deception poses a great risk. Incidents like the attack on USS Liberty have put a heavy burden on alliances with the United States, and are gradually eroding trust. Violation of international law through such attacks on civil infrastructure has serious humanitarian consequences. For example, in June 2025, a bomb was dropped into an Iranian hospital.
However, Israel enjoys full US diplomatic protection and can protect officials from all forms of accountability, including war crimes in Gaza and ICC arrest warrants for Joab Gallant and crimes against humanity in Gaza.
However, such a veil of protection is not impermeable, as revealed by a plot that failed in US soils in 2025. This highlights the growing danger and the increased global anti-intellectual manipulation. Iran’s successful intervention in exposing such operations shows the declined property of these tactics.
For more than 80 years, Israel has institutionalised false flag activities, achieving institutional and strategic outcomes such as Operation Susannah and Dimona’s deception. However, the current international environment requires strict forensic scrutiny of such operations and adherence to international norms.
As the Tehran Times revealed on June 25, 2025, Israel had planned to explode in US soil and then blame Iran. The obvious purpose of instigating a full-scale war between the United States and Iran, and the purpose of instigating emergency and preemptive action against the decadence of the state, is essential to protecting global order.