Tehran – In his commentary, Sharg wrote about Trump’s double approach. In a recent interview, Donald Trump announced that he had written a letter to Iranian leaders, expressing his hopes that Tehran is ready for negotiations.
These statements illustrate the White House’s dual approach. This uses maximum pressure campaigns and diplomacy simultaneously to achieve your goals. Washington wants to force Tehran to accept that condition by putting pressure on him and limiting Iran’s financial resources. The current state of Iran-US relations is a combination of intense economic pressure and secret diplomatic efforts. Trump’s recent statement on Russia’s diplomatic moves and sending letters to Iran demonstrates his desire to create space for possible negotiations. In the meantime, Iran will assert its position and refuse to negotiate under pressure. The future of these tensions relies on complex diplomatic interactions and regional development, but lasting solutions seem possible only through dialogue and escalation.
Donya-e-eqtesad: The atmosphere is getting more complicated
In an interview with former Iranian diplomat Kourosh Ahmadi, Donya Ektesad discussed Trump’s letter to the leader of the revolution. He said: Speculation about negotiations between Iran and the United States has escalated once again. On the one hand, the Iranian president mentioned efforts to prepare for negotiations between Moscow and Washington, while on the other hand, news has been released that Trump has expressed his willingness to write and negotiate with Iran’s revolutionary leader. The letter is a continuation of Trump’s negotiation efforts that have been going on since his first round. The only difference is that it makes the problem a little more serious, and it appears that the letter also has a threatening tone. The Russian efforts were predictable after Sergei Lavrov’s visit to Iran. The problem is that Trump gave Putin a big concession on the Ukraine issue. Russia wants more than 20% of Ukraine, and is trying to influence Eastern Europe. So Putin needs to be able to support Trump, which complicates the matter.
sobh-e-no: act smart, not falling into a trap of negotiations
In the memo, Sobh-e-no referenced some points regarding the possibility of negotiations with the US. It writes: In the current situation, direct negotiations with the US could result in a trap where Iran’s costs exceed its profits. However, using diplomatic channels, including Russia, could be a temporary tactic to reduce pressure without falling into the trap of Washington’s demands. This situation requires diplomatic intelligence and rushed decisions to avoid. Given that Russia has agreed to mediation between Iran and the United States, this opportunity can be used as a tool to reduce pressure on the country. Instead of falling into a direct negotiating trap, Iran needs to use diplomatic opportunities to increase economic cooperation and reduce pressure. Tehran needs to adopt strategies that should not only avoid forced negotiations, but also find new ways to increase economic and diplomatic power.
Ettelaat: Trump’s dangerous plan to prevent Iran’s oil exports
During the analysis, Etterat discussed Trump’s plans to disrupt Iran’s oil sales. US President Donald Trump’s administration is considering plans to suspend and inspect Iranian oil tankers at sea, and the action takes place under the so-called “international” agreement. Trump has pledged to regain the failed policy of “maximum pressure” to isolate Iran from the global economy and cut the Islamic Republic’s oil exports to zero. With experience proven ineffective to this type of occlusionism, the current US administration is trying to take action in the international field. The US provocative action comes at a time when previous attempts to block Iran’s oil shipments have undergone mutual response. According to Ben Cahill, director of energy markets and policy at the University of Texas’s Center for Energy Environmental Environmental Systems Analysis, given Iran’s capabilities and the fact that buyers find ways to avoid them, the less effective the more sanctions continue, the less effective the more effective the more effective the more.