TEHRAN – The Omani sultan officially announced the cancellation of planned US-Iran nuclear talks on Sunday, with Foreign Minister Badr Albusady confirming the news on Saturday.
“The talks with Iran, scheduled to be held in Muscat this Sunday, are no longer happening. But diplomacy and dialogue remain the only path to lasting peace,” wrote a top Muscat diplomat.
The move followed an explicit military attack by the Israeli regime early on Friday. He reportedly martial artists of civilians, military personnel, nuclear scientists and more than 100 Iranians, including targeted residential areas and critical infrastructure.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragci spoke with European officials and directly criticized Washington for enabling aggression.
He emphasized that continuing consultations would be “unjust, but a wild Israeli attack would continue.”
Araghchi claimed that Tehran viewed the attack as “the result of our direct support” and wasted diplomacy, with American allies bombing Iranian soil.
Esmaeiru Bakaei, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, reflected this attitude and declared “meaningless” negotiations after Tel Aviv.
“We cannot insist on negotiations while we’re greenlighting the Zionist regime to target Iran,” Bakaei said.
He added that Iran’s immediate priorities were to “facing enemy attacks,” and that dialogue with the party “conspired with invaders’ crimes” was worthless.
At the UN Security Council, Iranian Amir Said Irabani denounced Washington’s “stained hand” and declared that the Israeli attacks had wiped out space for dialogue.
Adjusted duplication and tricks for war
The collapse holds back months of tense negotiations mediated by Oman from April. Five previous rounds in Muscat and Rome brought minimal progress and withstand Washington’s demand for “zero enrichment.” Tehran from Red Line was repeatedly rejected.
Despite public claims about Trump’s “serious progress,” US Special Envoy Steve Witkov suddenly argued that Iran would abandon all of its enrichment capabilities, which are Iranian officials known as “unnegotiable.”
A few days before the attack, US and European allies expanded Tehran to non-compliance Tehran by engineering anti-Iran resolutions in the IAEA, the toughest in 20 years.
Iran responded by announcing plans for Fordow’s third uranium enrichment site and advanced centrifuge.
Importantly, Sunday’s meeting was to feature Iran’s formal counter-proposition to US demands. Instead, the Israeli strike has preceded the diplomatic off-ramp.
Evidence now confirms that the attack was facilitated by Washington.
A few days ago, the US quickly tracked 300 Hellfire missiles to Israel under a $7.4 billion weapons package, the Middle Eastern Eye reported, adding that two U.S. officials had admitted that the Trump administration was “well-informed” about the operation.
Trump’s own statement betrayed, “We knew everything.” He also described the horrifying Israeli attack as “excellent” and “very successful,” further highlighting his accomplice in aggression refueling in a series of media interviews on Friday.
According to an unknown US official cited by CBS News, US naval assets, including USS Thomas Hadner, later supported Israel’s defense against Iran’s retaliation, but provided “exquisite intelligence” for the first attack.
Many Iranian officials and global analysts view the speech as a deliberate smokescreen.
“The negotiations have always been a ploy to prepare for the war that the US intended to pay,” observed geopolitical analyst Brian Berletic.
Analysts describe Iran’s mood as rebellious, and the public recognizes the US and Israeli conspiracy as inseparable.