Beirut – Palestine’s Nakba in 1948 marked a turning point in West Asia. Zionist entities were established to serve global imperialism, which made them more dangerous at the end of World War I than what happened, especially for Islamic Ummah.
After overthrowing Muhammad Ali Pasha’s army (the ruler of Egypt from 1805 to 1848), British Foreign Secretary Henry Palmerston (1784-1865) recommended the establishment of a human barrier separating the Maghreb from the Levant.
Therefore, the decision was made to establish the existence of Jews and to strengthen it militarily (in addition to providing Europeans with a way to solve Jewish problems) to secure the hegemony of all Western Asia in West Asia, dismantling cultural, religious and social fabrics.
British documents show that in 1947 the Palestinian Jewish ownership ratio was only 6%, but there are many myths that need to be rebutted, including the claim that Palestinians sold their land.
Another argument is that the Palestinians made a mistake by refusing to establish the Palestinian state as defined in 181 of division in 1947, justifying the establishment of a Zionist colonial regime.
It should be noted that this resolution was a blatant injustice against the 1.5 million Palestinians who owned 94% of the land and were given only 46% of the historic land, and that Zionist colonial settlers were armed with numbers of only 600,000 (only the Palestinians were not armed).
In his book, the famous Zionist historian, Iran Pape, a Palestinian ethnic cleanser, explains that ethnic cleansing began in Palestine in early December 1947.
To achieve this, Zionists relied on ethnic cleansing of genocides against the Palestinians, both individually and collectively, such as Deir Yassin and Tantura Genocides.
Palestinian historian Aleph al-Aleph explains the Palestinian state after the publication of the unfortunate division plan in his book, “Quds and Paradise Lost 1947-1949.”
Al-aref states: “The divisional plan had the worst impact on the Arabs and the biggest impact on the Jews. At the time, there were only a few armed Arab youths in the QUD, which could be counted on one hand.
On his part, Palestinian author Bahjat Abu Gharbiyeh states in his memoir:
The Arab reality did not change much after Nakbah. Rather, it was worsened by the normalization agreement with the Israeli occupation regime.
Thus, the Palestinians relied on themselves through uprisings and wars, including the current war, sacrificing thousands of lives and achieving historical heroes.
Today, Palestinians believe that the options for resistance are the most effective approaches in Gaza, the West Bank, and AL-QUDS.
The Palestinian people are in one place, Palestinian authority is in another place, in a completely different place, like the Arab regime that not only abandoned Palestine, but conspired against it.
How long will the questions to be addressed to the people and rulers of Islamic Umma, not Palestinians, continue to commemorate Naqba without serious action to regain the rights of Palestine and its people?
Of course, this is not a question of investigation, but one of the blames aimed at taking responsibility for these people for their inaction and weak response to the Palestinian cause, with the exception of Iranian resistant people who continue to struggle against Israeli-led Israeli-led extensions of Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran, and to direct serious blame.
What happened in the last two years is not normal. Historical comparisons must be used to understand political shocks and military set-offs and to draw out lessons and morality.
Amidst the suspension of US funding for UNRWA, a key pillar in serving Palestinians, US President Donald Trump has not kept secret the secrets of his vision for the Palestinian issue since entering the White House.
Trump’s vision is based on direct US controls that will lead to widespread demographic changes following a questionable strategy to transform Gaza into a “Middle Eastern Riviera.”
Palestinians are aware of these traps and will not fall victim to this psychological warfare and the deception of expansionist.
Meanwhile, the axis of resistance sacrificed its most prominent leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (RA). The United States and Israel never took their leaders as seriously as the martists had Said Nasrara, as he was the most influential figure.
Netanyahu explicitly stated that Nasrala was not only a leader in Hezbollah, but also the leader of the entire axis of resistance, and was not as influenced by Iran as it had influenced Iran’s policy.
His excellence states: “The vast majority of Palestinians believe there is a choice of resistance. What would have happened to Lebanon if Israel’s occupation of Lebanon was doomed and Hezbollah was not present? What did the Lebanese people go through?”
Martyr said Nasrallah said, “Just the Palestinians and Arabs have been waiting from 1948 until today, the Lebanese had to wait for a unified Arab strategy to free Lebanon from Zionist occupation.”
“No one should be fooled if the Arab world can protect Lebanon. We could not protect Palestine when it was united and united. And until now we could not protect Palestine (…) Our people, our will, our will, our will, our resistance was affirmed during the Nakba Memorial Day in May 2022.
Today, the United States and Israel are on alert to all generations of his followers, waiting for an opportunity to revenge against American and Israeli crimes.
Today, while the Arab regime in the Persian Gulf is engaged in projects that impose American and Israeli hegemony across the Arab region, there has grown the confidence that only irregular forces dare to stand up to Israeli occupation forces.
The biggest challenge is to learn from the previous stage and break through all the mistakes and harmful phenomena that undermined it, and to strengthen the strength and immobility of facing Zionism.
Without a doubt, despite the relentless media and political campaigns against the resistance movement that adopts American and Israeli discourse, Lebanon and Palestinian resistance and its popularity base cannot put the region’s future at risk by adopting options that mimic the priorities and demands of the US and Israel.