Tehran – In a memo, Hamshali analyzed the confusion among Iranian opposition parties overseas after the Trump administration blocked their funds.
It writes: In one of his first actions after arriving at the White House, US President Donald Trump decided to suspend most of US foreign aid. This executive order, which had a broad impact on US foreign policy, particularly the aid that disrupts Iranian opposition groups overseas, has led to a significant proportion of the aid being a part of the aid being carried out by the US government oversight. Because they provided funding. Reports show that over 30 opposition organisations outside Iran and the Persian language media have held meetings following Trump’s decision to review the situation and outcomes of these changes. Elon Musk, head of the Second Trump Administration’s Office of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has officially called for the closure of such agencies, including Iran Wire. Musk describes the institution as a “criminal organisation.” This decision was made primarily because of the waste of US government money by these organizations, but the inefficiency of these organizations also played a key role.
Sharg: Washington seeks a secret story with Tehran
In his commentary, Sharg pointed to Al Arabia’s report on Iran-US negotiations. The paper reveals that following the relatively smooth message recently exchanged between the US and Iran, senior European officials have revealed that efforts are underway to establish contact between the two countries. US President Donald Trump’s administration is calling for direct and secret negotiations with Tehran about the country’s nuclear program. The US government is about to reach an agreement with Iran by October when the current nuclear deal was signed in July 2015 and Trump withdraws in May 2018. Trump has repeatedly emphasized his willingness to negotiate with Iran in recent months, but has also increased the possibility of a military conflict. The US President has repeatedly emphasized that he likes to reach a “nuclear peace agreement” that allows Tehran to grow and prosper peacefully.
Farhikhtegan: A simple dream of a free world outside the home
In his analysis, Fahhictegan discussed the inhumane deportation of a group of Iranian immigrants from the US to Panama. It writes as follows: Immigration policies in Western countries, particularly the United States, show real faces in inhumane and racist ways. What has recently happened to several Iranian immigrants is the continuation of the same policy Donald Trump adopted during the first administration against immigration from several Muslim countries, including Iran. The case clearly illustrates the double policy of the US against immigration, which advocates support for freedom and human rights. But in reality, it suppresses and deports immigration without taking into account their fundamental rights. The issue of Iranian immigration to Western countries has become a hotly debated issue in recent years. Creating economic opportunities, improving social conditions, supporting talent, and creating hope among the younger generations are one of the measures that allow us to control the migration process.
Iran: Tehran’s good intentions
The Iranian newspaper analyzed the IAEA chief’s decision to postpone a quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear program. According to the newspaper, Rafael Grossi, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has decided to change the date of the report on Iran’s nuclear activities to the Governor’s Committee. It was possible to postpone the date of the Iranian report and add it to the rightful reason for the IAEA Director to link it to a new form of cooperation with Iran, which was the concrete reason for Japan’s cooperation a few days after approval by the Governor’s Committee. It was a sign. Anti-Iran resolution. Despite retaliatory actions in response to a violation of Western nuclear trade and increasing its uranium enrichment to 60% levels, Iran again showed goodwill towards the institution in the form of temporary understanding. Tehran’s focus on harnessing its intellectual and political capabilities to solve nuclear issues could be an obstacle to extremist Western opportunism. Therefore, extending the deadline for Iran and the IAEA to reach a common foundation provides opportunities for both to respond differently, based on the mechanisms applied, and of course, along with engagement policies. .