Tehran – In the analysis, Fahhictegan highlighted the failure of Israel’s attempts to create a rift between the Iranian people and the ruling party system.
The publication pointed out that the Israelis designed a comprehensive plan. It is to ignite widespread protests, misuse the public’s frustration and launch attacks that connect people to their cause. They hypothesized that the attacks deepen the gap between people and establishment. However, the outcome was completely the opposite. When the attack began, it helped to strengthen empathy and unity among the masses. In addition to this set-off for Zionists, the presence of revolutionary leaders at the Asura ritual of Imam Khomeini Hoseniniye sent a calculated resonance message on the socio-political climate.
His participation played an important role in healing the inner divisions that have recently emerged. With these conflicts settled, the nation is more unified than ever. This national solidarity, along with the opportunities that arise from it, is important in protecting this victory and strengthening the country’s social capital.
Jam-e-Jam: Iranian love
In the article, Jam-e-Jam discussed the existence of the leader of the Islamic Revolution at the Ashura Night Mourning Ceremony, writing: The existence of the leader of the Ashiora Night Ceremony revolution was a strategic and multifaceted action in a situation in which the Zionist regime and American officials threatened him. This existence was seen as a political, emotional and symbolic action to integrate not only religious events but also national solidarity and neutralize the psychological manipulation of the enemy.
Amidst the military, security and psychological threats of the enemy, this strategic presence had a major impact on Iranian society and the local equations. From domestic views, this action helped strengthen the spirit of social cohesion and resistance, especially in situations where the country was arising from war and reconstructing the damage faced by enemy psychological operations.
The lawsuit sent a clear message to people in their homes and abroad that Iran would not surrender to pressure or threats. From the message of the President and Foreign Minister to the analysis of global media, national and international responses demonstrate the importance of this event in redefineing Iran’s position in regional and global equations.
sobh-e-no: The enemy wants to turn defeat into victory in the media
In an interview with Sobh-e-No, Professor Saeed Abdolmaleki at University worked on an ongoing effort to whiten the actions of the Zionist regime. He said the recent wars have come with attempts from the US to mediate a ceasefire. According to Abdulmaleki, initiatives actually imposed on both the US and Israel due to the demonstration of Iranian power and the near collapse of the Israeli front.
He argued that the United States intervened primarily to save Israel from impending mistakes, but ultimately, what he described as the “archaic front led to the West” had been overcome by the Islamic revolution. Abdulmaleki outlined a multi-stage plan that he said was intended to overthrow the Iranian system. It aims to Akin in the strategy used in Syria, starting with the assassination of major elites, and to trigger attacks on nuclear and missile infrastructure and internal collapse. He argued that the ultimate goal was to divide Iran. This is a goal that was ultimately not achieved. Now, following their military failures, Abdulmaleki claims that the enemy is turning to the battlefield of the media. They rewrite the results and distorted false and false narratives on virtual platforms to obscure the reality of their defeat.
Arman-e-Melli: Where is the convergence or conflict?
In the memo, Ahman Emery deals with the presence of the Iranian president at the Baku eco summit, writing: On the one hand, Pezeshkian’s official visit to Baku was politically significant, while on the other hand, the location of the meeting (Khan Kandi) itself strengthened the alignment of Tehran Baku, sending a clear message to external forces who cannot count the differences that must be heading towards Iran and Azerbai and Azerbai. The presence of Pezeshkians in the city also showed that Iran was no longer merely an observer of the South Caucasus conflict, but rather entered the stage of realigning its relationship with Bak by embracing new geopolitical realities. Aliyev’s official welcome to the Iranian president showed that, as issues between the two countries do not end, out-of-territorial forces should no longer rely on the increasing differences between Iran and Azerbaijan.