Tehran – On the eve of the beginning of Iranian negotiations with the European side of Istanbul, Horasan wrote:
What distinguishes this series of negotiations from previous negotiations is the unprecedented convergence of Europe with the US and Israel after the recent 12-day war. Europe is no longer a mediator, a balanced and reliable partner, nor is it the third side of triangular pressure along with Washington and Tel Aviv. Europe currently has no new tools to put more pressure on Iran. What they are talking about in the name of the snapback mechanism is a psychological threat to gain fear and concessions over actual, implementable threats. In these circumstances, Iran should not receive any specific concessions and show no indication of withdrawal or flexibility regarding technical nuclear issues. The deals that are only asked to make technical concessions for people without practical and real results are actually playing on the opponent’s basis.
Etemado: To solve the country’s problems, we need to have dialogue with all political wings.
In a report released on Wednesday, Etemad cited President Masoud Pezeshkian at his meeting on Tuesday, who said that solving the problems facing the country would involve dialogue with opposition groups in opposition with the Islamic Republic. The President stated that the government is ready to be constructively involved in all political flows, saying, “Today, we are ready to talk with the opposition parties on the basis of fairness and justice. In a meeting with members of the Iranian Reform Front, Pezeshkian said, “The path of reform is a complicated path. Some statements may seem simple and easy, but it is much more difficult to actually implement them. Reform is a time-consuming process, and some changes may take 10 years.” The President described the government’s direction as an ongoing effort to achieve the set goals, and “We are following the paths defined by a specific purpose and based on public trust, and strive to fulfill them.” Pezeshkian expressed his gratitude for the wise actions of the Iranian state at a critical moment, adding:
Kayhan: The only guarantor of power, security
Kayhan editorializes to negotiate tips with his enemy, writing: We did not start this war. This war was imposed on dear Iran and in the middle of negotiations. This means they weren’t looking for negotiations. They were trying to turn Iran into another Syria or Libya, but they failed. Apart from these statements there are other indications that their views on negotiations are completely different from ours. Before the war, five rounds of indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States meant that the US was not at all serious and that when news broke out that the statement made during the meeting was different from the position made after the meeting, they were not looking for negotiations, but were planning to attack our country. Their clear goal was to split Iran. They pursued this goal in two ways. 1-Military Attack, 2-Negotiation! They failed military attacks. Now they are pursuing the same goals through negotiations.
Jam-e-Jam: Iranian Troika’s Negotiation Goals
Two basic goals were pursued in nuclear negotiations with the West. The sanctions were lifted and the war was prevented. After the actions of the Zionist regime and the US, it has actually been shown that dialogue and diplomacy logics have no place to resolve the conflict between Iran and the US. Of course, before the war, negotiations with Europeans were on the verge of solving nuclear issues were on the way, but with the aggressive actions of the Zionist regime and the US, there is no more hope for rational action in Europe. There are two types of snapback mechanisms: legal and political mechanisms. Europe shows that it doesn’t care about legal approaches, it calls for psychological warfare and puts pressure on Iran. Iran has many deterrent tools, including withdrawal from the NPT, increasing the proportion of rich uranium, and controlling and controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Therefore, if Europeans argue for a no-cause movement, they must prepare to face serious challenges with cheap energy supply. Europe has to pay for Zionist escalation with Iran as its economy stagnates under the burden of a proxy war between Russia and Trump’s tariffs.