TEHRAN – President Hamshahari surveyed the opinions of the MAGA (Make America Great Again) campaign and its supporters.
“Among those in the MAGA movement, a majority support President Trump’s policy toward Iran and unconditional support for the Zionist regime, and believe that Iranian actions pose a threat to democratic governance,” the magazine wrote. But some within the campaign argue that Israel is strong enough on its own that there is no reason for the United States to shoulder the financial burden if it chooses war with Iran. In reality, this second group is relatively small. This is precisely why President Trump has not hesitated to publicly take responsibility for potential military action against Iran. Nevertheless, President Trump has no interest in starting a major war with Iran. It is also noteworthy that the concept of regime change in Iran is highly unpopular and lacks significant support among Americans.
Kayhan: Iran’s eastward shift weakens Western influence
In his article, Kayhan referred to Iran’s response to Western pressure. “Western pressure has now pushed Tehran to the point where its political, security and economic ties with China appear almost ‘irreversible’,” the paper said. This marks a turning point where US sanctions have strayed from their original purpose and begun to create a new world order. The diplomatic impasse between Iran and the United States is accelerating this change. The Iranian government is reluctant to return to the negotiating table without firm guarantees, and the U.S. government is not willing to offer a credible avenue for dialogue. This vacuum is where China and Russia step in as strategic partners. The long-term costs for the West are high. Iran distanced itself from engagement with Europe and the United States and entered an illiberal order. This shows that sanctions have failed to change Iran’s behavior. Particularly noteworthy is that Western policymakers continue to cling to the model of “sanctions as a first and last resort,” despite the failure of sanctions strategies. This approach is not cost-free and is strategically demanding. The more Iran aligns with the East, the less influence the United States and Europe will have on Iranian decisions. From a balance of power perspective, this means a strategic retreat.
Sob-e-no: A strategy for active neighborhood diplomacy
Mr. Sob-e-No analyzed the significance of Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baggar Ghalibaf’s visit to Pakistan and interpreted it within the framework of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s “active neighborhood” strategy. The policy aims to reduce the impact of sanctions through regional linkages, strengthen resistance fronts, and leverage the economic and technical cooperation capabilities of Islamic countries. Considering the close ties between Pakistan and China, the Tehran-Islamabad dialogue could develop into a platform for trilateral cooperation between Iran, Pakistan, and China. Ghalibaf’s visit was not just a parliamentary mission, but also a test of new possibilities for cooperation as Iran seeks to deepen ties with its allies following victory in the 12-day war and strengthened deterrence. If the agreements reached during this visit are implemented, economic relations between Tehran and Islamabad could be elevated from their current status to a strategic level. The visit represented a fusion of resistance diplomacy, regional economics, and cultural engagement. This visit was more than a ritual, it sent a clear message. Iran is pursuing a new regional order based on cooperation among Islamic countries, and Pakistan, as a friend in difficult times, is poised to be a key link in this new framework.
Mr. Resalat: Recognizes the value of Iran’s geopolitical position
In a recent article, Resalat highlighted Iran’s exceptional geographical position in the region. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s unique location, connecting Central Asia, the Caucasus, Russia, the Persian Gulf, and the Indian subcontinent, has the potential to become a central hub for global transportation. This potential embodied in the North-South Corridor is more than just a construction or transportation project. It’s part of Iran’s broader economic strategy. These corridors serve as important links between Iran and the region’s emerging economies, offering unprecedented opportunities to expand trade ties with its neighbors and allies. Revitalizing these transport routes is an effective means to avoid bottlenecks and increase national economic resilience. To gain its rightful place in the regional and global economic system, Iran needs to use its geographical advantages more wisely. The strategic use of the North-South Corridor will bring tangible economic benefits and reflect the country’s geo-economic assets that support sustainable growth. A comprehensive approach to transportation development, infrastructure modernization, and strategic planning to strengthen Iran’s role in international trade is not just an economic necessity. It is a step towards strengthening the nation’s power and achieving lasting independence.