TEHRAN – The offensive attacks by the Zionist regime on Iran, supported by the US, and several European countries and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) could lead to criminal responsibility for those who played their role, said Heybatra Hazhandimanesh, a faculty member at the University of Alamehata Bay. Private hospitals have been targeted by evil regimes, the IRNA reported.
According to international law, hospitals are considered cultural and supported assets. Therefore, they should not be attacked.Deliberate attacks on religious, educational, artistic and scientific sites, as well as historical monuments and hospitals, are considered war crimes.Private hospitals should not be attacked under any circumstances. They should be respected and supported by the war side. If the hospital is being attacked, it is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
According to an article by the International Criminal Tribune Association, attacks on hospitals are considered war crimes. The actions of the Zionist regime are therefore a violation of this regime’s international obligations to international law.These attacks are considered a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. They are considered war crimes.
Therefore, it leads to criminal responsibility for the prime minister, defense minister, army headquarters, air force chief, and pilots carrying out the air force of the Zionist regime.Additionally, those who played a role in planning and implementing these attacks, including supplying weapons, financial supplies and information supplies, are responsible for them.
In addition to Zionist officials, army commanders, soldiers, the US president, regional US military commanders and IAEA directors, they appear to be responsible.Apart from Iranian courts, courts in other countries are also obligated to investigate Zionist crimes.According to Article 19 of the 4th Geneva Convention, support from private hospitals should not be stopped.
Attacking hospitals is illegal and a war crime. All hospitals in the war-side areas are included in this support. Army emergency issues should not be used as an excuse to attack hospitals.
Assets included up to the 1949 Geneva Convention consisted of private hospitals, medical aircraft and ambulances. Iranian hospitals and private structures did nothing but humanitarian duties. They are not applied as places to attack enemies.
The aggressive attacks of the Zionist regime on our country and our hospitals have received no response from the European countries. This was criticised by some European countries, including Denmark, when Iranian missiles hit Israeli military structures and the waves reached nearby hospitals. This European approach can be viewed as a hypocrisy and selective approach in the implementation of international rights.