Tehran – In commentary, Etterat dealt with Donald Trump’s interest in expressing his interest in negotiating with Iran.
Iranians do not believe that Iran has a nuclear bomb in principle and say that consultations should be within the framework of mutual respect. This wise and logical response is something Trump needs. Among the most obvious points that are not overlooked is Iran’s right to missiles and other necessary defense tools, and contrary to Trump’s claims, the Revolutionary Guard’s status is anti-terrorist forces. These are one of Iran’s red lines, and the country or government that is about to negotiate with Iran must agree that these issues can never be negotiated. We must also know that Iran’s Islamic Republic has sufficient power to negotiate honorable matters with any country. Trump’s mistake is that he wants to negotiate with the language of power. This contradicts the nature of negotiations. If the US president wants real negotiations, he must first abandon the language of bullying and secondly provide reliable assurances.
Siasat-e-Rooz: We needed the consistent approach needed to solve economic problems
Siasat-e-Rooz wrote and compiled and wrote to the unity needed to disappoint the West: Unfortunately, Iran’s economic challenges are weakened as Iran weakens and Trump imposes new sanctions on Iran It caused the misconception that I was encouraged by.
Western actions indicate that negotiations are not rational, intellectual, or honorable at the current time. Rather, negotiations will pave the way for excessive demands on the other side and increased fearful mail. In addition to the country’s military and defence forces, the consistent approach of people and politicians to solve economic problems can disrupt Western equations. The main point lies under the illusion that the West has reduced general support for the system, which is why it applies pressure and sanctions policies. The positive presence of people in celebrations marking the victory of the 1979 revolution can even disrupt many equations and pave the way for sanctions from the West and reducing “maximum pressure” campaigns.
Sharg: Double pressure? !
In an interview with International Law Professor Yousef Moraei, Sharg discusses the political and diplomatic atmosphere caused by the deadlock in negotiations between Iran and the West. I did. He said: Iran’s nuclear activity issues have political implications, and Trump’s return to cooperation with London, Paris and Berlin will help to strengthen pressure on Tehran. Trump has signed an official presidential memorandum of understanding against Iran to revive the biggest pressure campaign. Therefore, according to news reports, the US mission to the United Nations is a process in which it will work with three major US allies, members of the JCPOA, to immediately return international sanctions and restrictions in the Islamic Republic. indicates to complete. At the quarterly meeting of the IAEA Governor’s Committee, Washington could try to induce Europe to activate the trigger mechanism. We may issue a resolution against Tehran as we witness Israel’s move towards Israeli national security. The IAEA is a technical and legal organization, but it can be influenced by the influence of political attitudes and power.
Iran: Lessons learned by Riyadh
In the analysis, the Iranian newspaper discussed relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia. This paper, coupled with Iran’s undeniable role in the political arrangements in the region and the changes in long-term policies of Saudi Arabia and several other Arab countries, has made regional interactions important. did. In recent years, Saudi Arabia has inevitably learned lessons from the consequences of Middle Eastern tensions and found that military attacks to resolve regional crises are effective. Achieving security and stability in the region mainly involves avoiding conflicts with influential actors, especially Iran. Riyadh has an ideal economic position and to become a global hub of trade and investment, its profits must be linked to Tehran, and consider restoring the relationship and establishing a strategic partnership with Iran. I realized that. Will a better opportunity to achieve this goal strengthen our ties with the new Iranian government, which has declared it ready to be friends with all countries in the region?