TEHRAN-ARMAN-EMROOZ wrote in the analysis. Trump had previously wanted to end the war and did not start or continue.
Therefore, it is unlikely that he gives Netanyahu to control. Iran is a problem that Trump and Netanyahu may oppose. Netanyahu openly talked about his hope for the United States’ support when attacking Iranian nuclear facilities. However, Trump seems to be ready to increase his “maximum pressure” campaign, but it is not clear that he wants to start a war. Trump also vaguely indicates that his only concern is Iran’s nuclear plan, suggesting that he is ready to rely on diplomacy, not power. Therefore, there is almost no problem between Trump and Netanyahu that may have an immediate agreement. Trump can easily guarantee that Israel has a means of starting war. He will probably relieve Netanyahu’s enthusiasm to continue the war ahead of the new commitment.
Siasat-E-Rooz: Iran is the center of security
Siasat-E-Rooz argued that Trump’s policy is based on the principles of world safety. The United States knows that the new multilateral order is moving toward completion, which means the end of the United States. Since Iran regards the local safety as its own safety, his experience has proved to the world that Iran is the center of security. By relying on domestic power, Iran has achieved many technical results in the defense field used in aerospace, maritime, and local safety. In contrast, the Zionist administration is the center of crisis and anxiety in the region. The truth is that Trump chose his path, and, like other US President, his approach was consistent with the interest of the Zionist. Therefore, the solution to repeat the maximum pressure failure is to close the eyes on the new agreement and to neutralize sanctions through a wider area of directors.
Shag: Netaniyafu’s challenge to Trump about Iran
In an interview with Vahido Bayani, a senior commentator on the Middle East, the Middle East issue discussed Netanyahu’s visit to the United States. He states: An important problem for Netanyahu’s visit to the United States is to get Donald Trump’s consent to the full -fledged conflict with Iran. Netanyahu is trying to persuade the US President on the path of military attacks. Trump has no positive view of Iran, and probably increases the largest sanctions, but in the early stages of the formation of domestic and foreign policy, he still wants a war. It doesn’t seem to be. Of course, Donald Trump has not revealed his concerns about the nuclear plan of the Republic of Islam, which may mean his desire for diplomatic solutions, not a military conflict. 。 This is a desirable option for Saudi Arabia and Persian Gulf. Therefore, Trump and Netanyahu are expected to agree to several issues.
Iran: Not Iran!
In the article, Iran’s newspapers are working on local conditions and important beings in the region of the Islamic Republic. Regardless of the difference in negotiations on Iran’s political approach and negotiations to reduce sanctions with the United States, international observers are the current reality of the Middle East, especially after the October 7 event. We emphasize the need to pay attention. Tel Aviv is trying to restore strategic deterrence against enemies. Conversely, the Middle East is now focusing on trying to reform their economic and social systems with the experience of Trump’s “maximum pressure” policy against Iran. These countries want to prevent more widespread regional wars, which may impair recent results. On the other hand, considering the constructive involvement and political independence policy with the world, Iran can manage the current turbulence and provide a comprehensive work model. Currently, the decision on what kind of negotiations with the United States will be used to implement this model is up to Tehran.