Donald Trump’s proposal to Gaza’s US acquisition was filled with rage and dull rejection from regional allies, joy from Israel from the right, and warnings against “ethnic cleansing” from the UN chief, the Guardian on Wednesday Reported.
“Avoid ethnic cleansing in any form,” Antonio Guterres said on Wednesday that the US president would “own” Gaza and want Palestinian residents to resettle elsewhere. It’s essential.”
An unusually wide wave of international rage and condemnation followed Trump’s shocking announcement after a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Germany said the plan violated international law, and that the Brazilian president “can’t understand” it, and that China opposed “forced transfer.”
Trump was touched by hours of global criticism, and told reporters in the Oval Office that he “loves everyone” in the oath of his new Attorney General Pam Bondi.
One place where the president’s claims were true is one of Israel’s far-right circles, and his proposal is accepted as a pathway to fulfilling its long-standing political goal of stripping Gaza from Palestinian rule. I did.
And in an interview with Fox News on Wednesday, Netanyahu himself said he saw nothing wrong with Trump’s proposal.
“This is the first good idea I’ve heard,” Netanyahu said. “It’s an amazing idea, and I think it really should be pursued, considered, pursued and done.
Both regional critics and supporters say that Trump’s vision for the “Riviera for the Middle East” is only novel when trying to insert the US directly at the heart of the world’s most unstable and long-term conflict. I recognized it.
It assumes that Gaza will be empty for residents, effectively seeking ethnic cleansing, and whether Palestinians can be encouraged to be forced from the territory or leave with economic incentives. Following decades of discussion in.
Trump hopes that neighboring countries, which rely heavily on US aid and military support, including Egypt and Jordan, will provide new homes to Gaza’s 2.3 million residents.
Addressing Trump’s plans on Wednesday, White House spokesman Caroline Leavitt said “it doesn’t mean ground boots in Gaza.” .
She also characterized the US president as committing to “temporarily relocating” Palestinians from Gaza.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Trump plan was not intended as a “hostile move.”
Saudi Arabia was one of the first countries to reject Trump’s projects to reconsider Gaza as a real estate outlook and perhaps the most consequential.
The deal establishing diplomatic relations with Israel is a potentially lucrative award that both Joe Biden and Trump pursued enthusiastically in his first term and supported by Netanyahu.
Riyadh quickly announced a “clear rejection” of attempts to drive the Palestinians out of their land. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has ruled out regularization without the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Next week, Jordanian King Abdullah, facing a difficult face-to-face meeting with Trump in Washington, has rejected “an attempt to land and drive the Palestinians away.”
It was not the first time he had made clear about Jordan’s position. The country already hosts more than 2.7 million Palestinian refugees, and accepting Gaza people under obsession will have a volatile effect.
Egypt’s Foreign Ministry said reconstruction must occur “without the Palestinians leaving their territory.” It had previously warned that attempts to transfer people from Gaza to Sinai would threaten peace deals.
Later on Wednesday, Egyptian President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi and his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron said that “forced displacement” in Gaza’s population was “unacceptable.”
“It is a serious violation of international law, an obstacle to the two states’ solutions and will be a major instability force in Egypt and Jordan,” according to a statement from the French presidency, and the two leaders The person said.
The US President had anticipated these rejections in advance and shrugged. They were convinced that both countries were vulnerable due to their reliance on American money and weapons.
“The king of Jordan and the Egyptian generals open their hearts and give us the land they need to accomplish this,” Trump told a news conference after plotting a US acquisition.
However, the political and security implications of bringing a large number of people from Gaza under obsession would be a powerful offset to even the most aggressive threat from the White House.
Trump’s comments came at the start of negotiations for the second phase of the ceasefire contract in Gaza, causing fear that they could threaten their speech, but the framework cites Gaza’s long-term plans for the future Followed to the third stage.
Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, a host and key mediator of the final round, said they are focusing on extending the current contract as it will expire at the end of the month.
“I don’t think it’s time to comment on a particular idea,” spokesman Majed Al-Ansari told Fox News. “It’s too early to talk about this because we don’t know how this war will end.”
Israeli far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotric has accepted Trump’s comments as proof of his decision to stay with the Netanyahu government despite fierce opposition to the ceasefire and hostage release agreement.
The US plan “finally, with the help of God, fills in the dangerous ideas of the Palestinian state,” he said in a victory statement. “Trust me, this is just the beginning.”
Rival far-right leader Itamar Ben Gwil suggested that Trump’s proposal would effectively deny the need for a ceasefire talk. This has been hidden from the start with the lack of Israeli plans in post-conflict Gaza.
“The only solution for Gaza is to encourage Gazan to migrate, and this is the ‘next day’ strategy,” Ben Gwil said.
“I call on the Prime Minister to announce the adoption of the plan as soon as possible and to begin immediate, practical progress.”
Benny Gantz, one of Netanyahu’s biggest political rivals, supports Trump’s plan to resettle Palestinians outside of Gaza as “worthy of praise,” and Israel said, “There’s nothing to lose from that.” He said he has only what he gets.
Only politicians from Israel’s relatively small left-wing political parties openly oppose Trump’s proposal, with Democrat Girad Caribbean warning of “Israel nightmare” and “the relocation will not occur and it will not bring safety.” I explained Eiman Ode. .
Base Naim, a member of the Hamas Political Bureau of Gaza, has shown that Palestinians are “stable” over 15 months of intense attacks, and that US troops sent to the territory will face the same opposition as Israeli forces. I stated.
“The failure of the occupation means that the American regimes and powers around the world will not be successful in implementing,” he said.