TEHRAN – In a memo, Kayhan addressed a new round of negotiations with the West and acceptance of reformist talks.
Reform media believe that the US president is probably trying to avoid taking a tough stance on Iran so that the path to dialogue to resolve the nuclear issue is not blocked. In the coming weeks and months, the official U.S. position on Iran is likely to become clearer, and these positions will likely focus on reducing tensions and finding a solution to the problem. One way to impose negotiations is to use “threats and coercion” techniques. The United States and Europe have used this technology many times before to contain Iran and prevent it from achieving indisputable rights in the nuclear field. To this end, the European troika (Britain, France, Germany) tried to threaten Iran with a trigger (snapback) mechanism some time ago. This is while those pretending to reform ignore the issue and seek to trade power for Iran by repeatedly insisting on negotiations. The West appears to be weakening Iran’s role in the region by creating a negative atmosphere toward Iran’s nuclear program and using hegemonic technology. This is while reformers ignore this policy and technology by insisting on negotiating with the US. The goal of American officials in negotiations with Iran is containment.
Iran: Voice of Tehran in Davos
In its analysis, Iranian newspapers discussed the trip of Vice President for Strategy Mohammad Javad Zarif to the 55th World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The purpose of Zarif’s trip was to explain the Islamic Republic of Iran’s policies in the region and the world. His consultations with officials present at this global conference were influenced by important issues such as the (Iranian) nuclear file, but his other goals were one of the main slogans of the Pezeshkia government: , namely to elaborate on de-escalation and de-escalation and de-expansion. A positive and balanced relationship between East and West. The realization of this idea is impossible without dynamic diplomacy. Zarif sought to present a clear picture of Iran’s principled goals and demands to neutralize anti-Iranian narratives and repair relations with regional powers. He stressed that Iran is not a threat to global security and that some countries are trying to present a false image of the country by promoting Iranophobia.
Arman-e-Melli: US will not return to talks
Arman-e-Melli interviewed international relations analyst Dr. Pirouz Mojtahedzadeh to analyze and explore the prospects for negotiations with Trump. He said: Trump’s statements at the inauguration set the mood in a direction where it appears that his administration is once again seeking to pursue a policy of maximum pressure against Iran. Analyzing the existing reality requires cooperating with this vision in which Iran is not seen equally as a regional power and the United States as a global power. Iran is engaged in competition at the regional level, which is not relevant globally. Tehran’s competition with the United States is related to Iranian issues in the region and relations with Middle Eastern countries. World powers should not interfere with the creation of balance in our region. If Iran pursues its interests in the region, it must reach a level of influence where foreign actors cannot play a role in the regional equation. Bringing the US to the negotiating table with Iran will not be easy and should follow other paths that have their own difficulties.
Shargh: Bin Farhan’s claims are just rhetorical
Sharg analyzed the Saudi foreign minister’s remarks in Davos that downgraded the risk of an Israel-Iraa war due to Trump’s return to the White House. Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan recently spoke about the need to rule out tensions between Tehran and Tel Aviv. The statement of the head of Saudi diplomats does not appear to be unrelated to political changes and developments in Washington. It must be said that the position of Saudi foreign policy officials is just diplomatic rhetoric. Given the current situation and Donald Trump’s return to the White House, there is no possibility of a direct conflict between Iran and Israel in a short time. Moreover, the Netanyahu government is on the verge of collapse. Netanyahu seeks major tensions with Tehran to avoid the collapse of his coalition government. Tehran will have to wait for the collapse of the cabinet and early elections, which is unlikely to happen with Donald Trump coming to power.