After Donald Trump missed out on the Nobel Peace Prize in one of the most surprising and controversial moments in soccer history, the International Federation of Football Associations (FIFA) awarded US President Donald Trump the first-ever FIFA Peace Prize at the 2026 World Cup draw ceremony at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC.
The incident sparked waves of ridicule, anger and shock around the world in just a few hours. This award is unprecedented, and his name was introduced for the first time during the award ceremony. It had no clear criteria, no selection or evaluation process, and, according to some FIFA executives, was not created with the knowledge or approval of the FIFA Council. For this reason, many saw it not as a sporting honor, but as another symbol of FIFA’s transformation into a political tool in the service of the White House.
Creation of a sudden unknown prize
At the beginning of the ceremony, an exaggerated video was played announcing that the FIFA Peace Prize is awarded every year to a person who has made an “outstanding contribution” in the field of peace. Moments later, FIFA President Gianni Infantino invited Trump to the stage and enthusiastically handed him a medal that, in Trump’s own words, “can be worn anywhere.”
Mr Infantino introduced Mr Trump as a representative of “5 billion soccer fans” and said the US president was fully deserving of such an honor. Trump smiled and wore the medal around his neck, repeating his earlier claims that he would end “eight wars” and “save millions of lives.” But for many, it’s not Trump’s comments that are unbelievable. It was the fact that an award with no structure, no standards, and no administrative transparency had been created out of thin air and handed to a president known not for peace but for military operations and international tensions.
Global outrage: From ridicule to shock
Reactions around the world were almost immediate, severe and widespread. Social media was flooded with critical comments, with users calling the move a “political comedy,” “an insult to the concept of peace” and “political bribery.” Many wrote that FIFA had “invented prizes” to satisfy President Trump, with one scoffing that it was “like making candy for kids.”
Even prominent media figures and international activists said the award was a tool to whitewash President Trump’s image and a further sign of the complete politicization of FIFA. The intensity of the response was so great that within hours the award’s name became one of the most recurring global topics. Many cited the move as an example of hypocrisy by an organization that has always claimed “freedom from politics.”
Clear violation of FIFA’s political neutrality rules
FIFA has long fined players simply for writing about the war in Gaza or expressing sympathy for victims of the conflict. But this time, the same organization awarded a “peace” award to a president who has ordered naval strikes, issued military threats against Iran, offered unconditional support to Israel in the Gaza war, and has been repeatedly criticized by human rights groups for his harsh immigration policies. Many analysts saw this act as a sign of double standards. This means that while FIFA’s top executives themselves are involved in politics at the highest level, players are prohibited from doing even the slightest political thing.
Political ties between Trump and Infantino
The close relationship between Mr. Infantino and Mr. Trump has been a topic of discussion in the media for years. His frequent attendance at U.S. political events, multiple meetings with Trump at the White House, and public support for the idea of awarding Trump the Nobel Peace Prize, all of which have drawn a political alignment between the two, is made even clearer with this award.
Some FIFA insiders say there has been pressure to create a replacement award after President Trump became frustrated at not winning the Nobel Prize, and Infantino was looking for a way to “make up for” the disappointment. Their relationship has gained further attention in recent months after Trump stood in the middle of the victory celebration during the Club World Cup final, despite having no official role, and Infantino handed Trump an extra medal as a “souvenir.”
Human rights criticism and international influence
The reaction wasn’t limited to social media. Human rights activists, researchers and international organizations have described the award as a “political sham” and “an abuse of the concept of peace.”
A former United Nations official called the award a complete trivialization and said FIFA, which has remained silent on Israeli atrocities, is now trying to exonerate President Trump by creating a fake award.
Many emphasized that President Trump’s actions, from naval strikes in the Caribbean to military orders against Iran and anti-immigration policies, have nothing to do with peace and that choosing him sends only one message: FIFA is willing to abandon its so-called principles in order to maintain political relations with the US government.
The collapse of FIFA’s last claim to neutrality
FIFA has long been under pressure from corruption scandals, bribery scandals and state influence. Infantino’s latest move deals a further blow to the organization’s legitimacy. Analysts say FIFA has now strayed far from the fundamental principles on which it was founded, and that such awards show that the slogan “football without politics” has become meaningless and purely promotional. Some even believe that the Peace Prize is less a tool for recognition and more an effort to strengthen political ties and secure Washington’s approval, since the hosting of the 2026 World Cup and most of FIFA’s financial projects depend directly or indirectly on cooperation with the US government.
conclusion
The FIFA Peace Prize was intended to symbolize the “unifying power of football,” but in reality it became a clear demonstration of FIFA’s political maneuvering and an attempt to disguise the image of a president whose name is associated with military threats and international crises rather than peace. Not only did the award fail to instill credibility in Trump, but it also placed FIFA at the center of a new scandal. This is yet another example of how the very organization that fines athletes for raising humanitarian slogans can become a tool for the political agenda of those in power. In the end, rather than being a symbol of peace, the award has become a symbol of the politicization of sport and the deterioration of the concept of peace in today’s politicized world.
MNA/6680292