Siasat-e-Rooz, compiled on the US criminal attacks on Iran, wrote: In a massive war crime, US terrorism launched target attacks on Fordau, Isfahan and Natantz, with bombs that violated international law and produced bunkers.
Trump is a call for his diplomacy and promises, and has proven that diplomacy is virtually meaningless to the West. Today, Iran’s strategic patience ended due to US and Zionist miscalculation and the deception of Europeans, and the time has come for a decisive response that will make the invaders regret. In the meantime, Europe is Zionists and US crime partners and facilitators, and is unable to be on the safe side as it officially shows that their oil profits in many regions and their businesses are legitimate targets in the region’s major economies. The great men of Yemen are trusted partners and allysists who can change the historical courts along with Iran. Today, diplomacy must move from the west to the east and warn countries such as Russia, China, India and others. The West immediately chases them, and Iran is where the world needs to protect.
Jam-e-Jam: America’s big mistakes and consequences
In the memo, Jammu et Jammu said in addressing an aggressive US attack on Iran: The US strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities took place in a situation where Iran’s nuclear activity as a signature of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was completely peaceful and within the framework of its commitment to international law, including protection agreements. Meanwhile, the US is the first and only user of a nuclear bomb against the people of the country (Japan). In this respect it has become once again clear that American officials have no authority to comment on peaceful programs. The key point is that the US and other allies of the Zionist regime should know that the state will better recognize their malice and not be fooled by their lies. It will not be too far for Western countries to bring European and American leaders and head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mr. Grossi, to their false courts.
Hamshahri: Table options to punish America
In his analysis, Hamshali discussed options that could punish the United States after a criminal attack on Iran, writing: Iran’s missile capabilities are considered one of the main options that will give you a decisive response to recent US attacks, but the Islamic Republic has the ability to use a variety of tools, including operations by resistance groups, direct missile attacks on US bases, advanced cyber attacks, nuclear attacks, accelerate nuclear programs, and shut down the Strait of Hormuz. Iran can take concrete steps to develop its nuclear program, as it responds to the US withdrawal from the JCPOA in the past. According to current statistics, Iran produces a significant amount of uranium each month with different purities at different levels. Currently, over 1,000 advanced IR-6 centrifuges and approximately 700 IR-2M units are in operation.
Shargh: Diplomacy in a security emergency
In the article, Sharg analysed Abbas Araguc’s visit to Türkiye and took part in the Istanbul Summit. It writes as follows: In an age when development on earth and political pressure simultaneously exposed Iran to one of the most complicated crises in recent years, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ responsibility to accurately, effectively and timely reflect its official position has achieved double importance. In such a situation, the participation of Iranian foreign ministers at a meeting of Islamic Foreign Ministers is not merely a ritual, but part of an epic diplomatic strategy to highlight Iran’s official assessment of regional and global development (following the attacks on nuclear weapons of Israel and the US). The Istanbul Summit provided Iran with the opportunity to use diplomatic channels to express its official status in a rights-based form based on regional interactions, in a tense military atmosphere. Using the capabilities of organisations of Islamic cooperation, seeking to consult with major countries and raise issues in the form of emergency meetings indicates that despite working in security emergency situations, they continue to adhere to the path of dialogue, clarification of Tehran’s position and the path of use of multilateral tools.