Tehran – Sharg dedicated his main headline to the continued negotiations with three European countries, Germany, Britain and France, known as E3 in Istanbul, and on the eve of a meeting with three European countries in Iran and Istanbul, nuclear extrauterine tumors were once again subjected to difficult tests.
These talks are taking place, but Europe warns that without progress, snapback mechanisms will be activated. These lectures prove to be more than anything else, a field for testing diplomacy amidst regional tensions and international pressures. The Istanbul consultations are a crossroads of tension and hope, as Iran and Europeans are carefully trying to find solutions to prevent the situation from getting worse while maintaining Iran’s national interests in a critical situation. Ultimately, the fate of these consultations is important not only for Iranians and Europeans, but also for the stability of the entire region, as well as for other geopolitical equations. All eyes are in Istanbul, where the possibilities of victory and defeat will come together to shape a complex, uncertain future narrative.
Ham Mihan: Diplomacy Balance
In the memo, Ham Mihan attended a trilateral meeting between Iran, China and Russia, saying: By signing the JCPOA, we opened our arms to Europe and abandoned the Eastern Party. Now, in a situation where Iran and the United States have experienced direct war, those fantasy views on the eastern nations certainly cannot fulfill Iran’s national interests. If we are to leverage Eastern capabilities to balance with the West, we must engage China and Russia in pursuit of common interests by achieving concrete issues, changing negotiation strategies to achieve practical outcomes. If the recent trilateral conferences of Iran, China and Russia are merely becoming propaganda tools without strategic changes, it will not only benefit, but will not oriented towards balancing in any way, producing the opposite outcome. One of the drawbacks of our governance structure is the lack of timely and bold decisions. I hope that diplomatic devices will end this situation in terms of balancing global forces while respecting national interests.
Hamshari: Iran’s secret weapon against the Republic of Azerbaijan
During the analysis, Hamshari worked on oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Sea. This is especially true because the Republic of Azerbaijan supplies 40% of Israel’s energy needs from sea resources. It writes: The oil and gas resources of the Caspian Sea have once again become a focus of global attention in recent weeks. Azerbaijan has a key position in supplying the regime’s energy needs by supplying about 40% of the Zionist regime’s oil. These resources are extracted primarily from the oil and gas fields of the Caspian Sea. There is disagreement regarding the oil reserves in the Caspian Sea. The U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) estimates sea oil reserves at around 200 billion barrels, while the Oxford Energy Institute makes this figure 2.5-35 billion barrels. If Oxford’s estimate is correct, then the world’s Caspia oil reserves are only around 3%, not the 16% announced by the EIA. This significantly reduces the chances of the Caspian Sea becoming an alternative to the Persian Gulf in its oil supply. Overall, Iran can reduce Azerbaijan’s perception as a Zionist regime supporter and energy supplier by increasing production from the joint sector, which is Iran’s secret weapon against Baku and the Zionist regime.
Arman-e-Melli: Impact on Tehran-Washington Ties
Arman-e-Melli analyzed the impact of talks between Iran and Europe that began in Istanbul on Friday on the future of Iran-US interaction. It writes: Although the United States does not exist directly in Iran-European consultations in Istanbul, they effectively serve as barometers of future Iran-US interactions. If these talks end with an agreement or opening, the likelihood that Iran and the United States will return to diplomacy will increase, but if the talks fail, the road will be directed towards conflict, increased pressure, and even regional tensions. If Iran and Europe talk lead to concrete progress, the US is likely to view this as a positive sign of a return to the diplomatic path. In this case, Washington could take indirect measures to resume contact with Tehran through intermediaries such as Oman and the European Union. It should also be noted that the outcome of the Istanbul consultations could affect the US decisions regarding secondary sanctions or UN Security Council sanctions. If Europe is convinced that Iran has taken steps to alleviate tensions, it may pressure the US to refrain from impose new sanctions and encourage it to engage in multilateral talks.