In Tehran-Commentary, Siasat-e-Rooz worked on the recent Iran-Russia joint search and rescue exercise in the Caspian Sea, highlighting its strategic significance. The editor said the recent developments in the Caucasus and Caspia region have made it clear that efforts by the enemy of regional security, including Western countries and Zionist regimes, undermine unity, stability and neighbourhood relationships.
According to the memo, these actors are employing a variety of pretexts and tools to advance their economic and geopolitical agenda, and to turn the Caspian Sea from a zone of peace and cooperation into something prominent through conflict and exploitation. Coupled with provocative actions targeting Iran and Russia, questionable activities by the Zionist regimes in parts of the Caucasus raised regional concerns. A sudden, suspicious outreach to the West to Armenia and the aggressive move to reconstruct the region’s geopolitical landscape, such as the proposed Zangetour Corridor, are considered volatile forces. Furthermore, Western initiatives to launch oil and gas explorations in the Caspian Sea threaten the stability of coastal conditions. In response, the Iranian-Russia search and rescue movement in the Caspian Sea serves not only as a warning to actors who undermine the security and sovereignty of the region, but also as a declaration of unity and friendship between neighboring nations.
Javan: Characteristic aspects of moral and civilized victory
In his analysis, Jawan argued why Iran did not attack Israel preemptively, writing: Given the occupational nature of the Zionist regime, actions against this regime are considered defensive, but the conflict with this regime is not merely a political or security battle. It’s a full-fledged civilized battle. Islam with human identity – the battle between Iranian civilizations and false civilizations that have been stripped of moral and human principles. Iran’s ultimate victory in this decisive battle was historic. The first is a military and strategic victory, and the second is a moral and civilized victory. The wary and occupying actions of the Zionist regime are rooted in a crisis of identity, geographical weakness and existential fear. On the contrary, the Islamic Republic of Iran not only heroically defended the territorial and territorial integrity, but also proved to the world that it is possible to act humanitarian and ethical, even in the most difficult conditions of combat. The world witnessed the way from the heart of the fire and blood of war, a real Islamic Iranian civilization brought justice, wisdom and the voice of humanity to the ears of humanity, raising the flag of honor and dignity.
Iran: The true intention of Europe to propose to extend the snapback mechanism
In the commentary, the Iranian newspaper spoke to the European Troika conference with Iranian diplomats in Istanbul, and one day before the Istanbul speech, Reuters revealed a new proposal from the European Troika. According to Reuters, three European countries have proposed extending the “snapback mechanism” for another six months. On the surface, the proposal is presented for the purpose of a kind of political rest for diplomatic breathing, but essentially condition negotiations again on lesser-hidden requests, including Tehran’s official entry into a direct meeting with the United States, full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and providing accurate reports at that level. According to some observers, the proposal is seen as a tactic that erodes the negotiation process and adds to the one-sided European demands. A strategy designed to lay the foundation for new claims against Iran.
Donya-e-eqtesad: Iran’s hands are not empty
In the article, Donya Ektesad discusses Iran’s leverage in negotiations with the US, writing: For example, energy safety and sea route safety are extremely important to the United States, and Iran plays an important role in this respect in the northern Persian Gulf and in the Strait of Hormuz. In this region, the safety of American friends on the council and the security of the general community are very important to Washington. The priorities of these countries and the US are to keep them safe and avoid widespread war in areas that could spread to those countries. The US preference is to compromise with Iran in some way. And in this case, the US can withdraw most of its forces from the region and focus on top priorities such as China and Russia, as well as international security. Therefore, Iran can always have leverage for negotiations with the US as the most important potential regional force. Iran could also use regional diplomacy to reduce Western pressure when snapback mechanisms are activated.
