Beirut – The anti-resistance team will not hide their objections to the Southern Lebanon local elections, which coincides with the May 25th day of resistance and liberation. This reflects the deplorable moral decline of the anti-resistance team. They argue that encouraging people to vote is intentional by Shia duo!
Clearly, the team is going through an era of shameful and unprecedented humiliation and conquest, despite the Shiite duo (Hezbollah and the Amal Movement) highlighting the need for the largest families of cities and villages to nominate their candidates.
Twenty-five years after the historic victory of the resistance and the liberation of southern Lebanon, these people are resenting the enormous sacrifices made by the Resistance Front.
It is worth reminding that former Prime Minister Juad Siniola shamelessly requested that the cancellation of his liberation day’s holidays be cancelled during his tenure in government.
The anti-resistance teams seem to be unafraid of the consequences of their inflammatory and provocative rhetoric, sometimes calling for Hezbollah’s disarmament and sometimes criticising resistance to drag Lebanon into an ongoing US-led Israeli invasion.
Without a doubt, this continued attack was inevitable, and Hezbollah’s support front was not the cause.
As Hezbollah Secretary Sheikh Naim Qassem pointed out in his final speech, it was the Israeli occupation regime itself that led to the natural emergence of resistance!
In 1968 there was no resistance. At the time, Israel attacked Beirut Airport and repeatedly attacked the south. The soldiers of Saad Haddad were then paid by the Lebanese army, despite the fact that they were to defend Israel and not Lebanon!
In 1982, after the Palestinian Liberation Organization surrendered and left Lebanon, Israel refused to follow the UN resolution.
Today, more than ever, we need to define sovereignty. How can this team talk about sovereignty while a portion of Lebanon’s territory is in Israel’s hands?
How can we accept that US Ambassador Lisa Johnson has summoned Lebanese officials in a humiliating way?
Sovereignty means dignity, the dignity of citizens and nations.
Meanwhile, the Lebanese army continues its hostile rhetoric against the approach agreed upon by President Joseph Orn and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam regarding weapons in the resistance movement.
The Lebanese military believes that the Lebanese state and its military and security agencies must begin the process of disarmament, even by force, and is threatening to pressure the government to take strict measures against Hezbollah.
It may therefore not be surprising that the four Lebanese military ministers left the government on the pretext of failing to follow the pledge made at the beginning of the semester on disarmament.
Meanwhile, sources have revealed that Lebanese Americans and Saudi guardians have informed Lebanese military leader Samir Giagea that they have rejected this reckless move against the president, aoun and the prime minister, who could benefit Hezbollah.
It is worth noting that Geagea is deeply concerned about the foundation of President AON’s general popularity, as he has repeatedly said that it is impossible to coexist with the rest of the Lebanese who support splitting Lebanon into an expanded federation.
This team needs to learn lessons of sovereignty from Iranian negotiators who have achieved historic status in confronting the rhetoric of America’s supremely supreme rhetoric. This is sovereignty of its finest details, and sovereignty that limits America’s overlooking diplomacy.
If Iran is not sovereignly superior, why would it drag Trump into negotiations, especially when Washington and Israel claim victory in West Asia?
This team knows that Iran (the people and the state) will not surrender to an attack on their sovereignty.
Yemen has an undeniable geostrategic role in training US military and diplomacy.