Beijing – Recent escalation of hostility between Israel and Iran has led to intensified military exchanges, casting a terrifying shadow over the Middle East and beyond.
What began as a targeted strike has spiraled into a cycle of retaliation, with surprising results for regional stability, global security and most importantly human life. It is essential for all parties to step back from the brink, prioritize escalation, embrace multilateral diplomacy, and address the humanitarian crises unfolding right in front of our eyes.
The latest reports show harsh pictures. Israeli forces continue their attacks on what they identify as important Iranian military facilities and command centres, including reported strikes on nuclear facilities such as Arak Heavy Water Reactors and sites related to Natanz and Fordor. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has even said it was intended to prevent the existence (of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei). In response, Iran’s operation of “True Promise 3” saw a counterattack of missiles and drones targeting Israeli infrastructure. This includes what Tehran considers as a successful strike in Israel’s air defense systems, refineries and power grids.
This tart dynamic is more than just a localized competition. This is a deep threat to global impacts, including the ghosts of a wider regional war and the uncontrolled nuclear crisis, especially given the reports of damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities and the ongoing targeting of nuclear scientists.
The international community has a variety of responses, but it mainly points to the urgent need for de-escalation. A coalition of 21 countries, including Pakistan and Egypt, is collectively calling for a ceasefire, highlighting a broad regional and international consensus for further bloodshed. Convened amid the escalating crisis, G7 leaders also encourage de-escalation and ceasefire, underscoring the importance of protecting civilians.
But President Trump’s attitude is complex and evolving. He suddenly left the G7 summit and issued a harsh public call for evacuation in Tehran, claiming that “Iran cannot have nuclear weapons.” He hopes a “real end” for Iran’s nuclear program rather than just a ceasefire, and has approved the attack plan, but he said within two weeks that the US will decide whether to take part in direct military action and maintain ambiguity. His demand for “unconditional surrender” was rejected by Tehran, whose Foreign Minister refused to assert negotiations during the Israeli attacks.
In this unstable landscape, China’s role and status is clear and consistent. From the beginning, Beijing expressed deep concern over the escalating tensions. This is the sentiment that has been crystallized in the recent four-point proposals on Xi soon and peace. Xi first emphasized that ceasefires are an urgent priority and that it should be urged to halt hostility and prevent further escalation from all parties, especially Israel. Secondly, ensuring the safety of civilians must be the highest concern, and we call for strict adherence to international law and protections of innocent living. Third, dialogue and negotiation are fundamental solutions, emphasizing that military measures cannot solve complex issues like Iran’s nuclear programme, and that political diplomacy is of paramount importance. Fourth, peaceful efforts by the international community are essential, urging that key forces repeat China’s preparations for positive influence and play a constructive role.
This comprehensive framework guides China’s approach to the crisis. China also expressed deep concern about the serious consequences of its military action, opposes violations of Iran’s sovereignty, security and territorial integrity, and has refused to take action that exacerbates the conflict. China has cooled tensions, stressing the urgency for both Iran and Israel to resolve their differences through dialogue and calling for immediate measures to “put the brakes” on the conflict. After the Iranian province’s strike against television, China expressed “deep concerns” and “serious concerns” and “reveal concerns” reaffirmed that “stop the fire and end the war is the most pressing task, and that dialogue and consultation can bring about lasting peace.”
China’s position reflects consistent foreign policy principles of non-interference, respect for sovereignty and peaceful resolution of conflicts. Beijing’s involvement in the Middle East is increasingly focused on promoting stability through diplomatic means, as evidenced by the mediation of Saudi Arabian cover in 2023. Therefore, China’s demands for restraint, dialogue and ceasefire are not merely rhetorical. They are rooted in a practical assessment of global interests and a principled commitment to international peace and security.
The current trajectory of the Iran-Israel conflict is unsustainable. The risk of regional wars that could lead to wider fires is dangerously high. Nowadays, more sustainable and active multilateral diplomacy is essential than ever. All international actors must put maximum pressure on both Israel and Iran to escalate. This not only condemns the public for offensive behaviour, but also includes solid behind-the-scenes negotiations, leveraging all available diplomatic channels. The UN Security Council held an emergency briefing on June 20th at Iran’s request (supported by China, Russia, Algeria and Pakistan), representing an important forum. Perhaps under the auspices of the UN Security Council or specially convened international conference, national collective efforts are essential to establishing a comprehensive ceasefire and establishing a framework for dialogue.
The goal is to move beyond the cycle of retribution and move towards a true commitment to dialogue and exclusion. This, coupled with a firm rejection of violence as a means to achieve political ends, requires acknowledging legitimate security concerns from all parties. China clearly states that it is ready to play a constructive role in this process. The consistent defense of peace, dialogue and undue exhaust, coupled with its growing diplomatic influence, is uniquely positioned to promote a path to a more stable and peaceful Middle East. The international community must seize this opportunity, work together to work together to avoid catastrophes that have deep and lasting consequences for generations. The time has come for decisive action, diplomacy and peace.
(Jianlu Bi is a Beijing-based award-winning journalist and commentator on current affairs. His research interests include international politics and communication. He holds a doctorate in communication studies and a master’s degree in international studies.)
This article reflects the author’s opinions and is not necessarily the view of the Tehran era.