Beirut – Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton, writing for the Telegraph and writing for the Telegraph, said “Hezbollah shows no signs of giving up, and Unifil, the UN’s long-time Lebanon peacekeeping mission, has such a traumatic reputation for being an invalid ineffective, with its mission being finished at the end of 2026.”
“The Lebanese government faces difficult tasks to end Hezbollah’s military capabilities and prevent Iran’s continued financial and other support,” Bolton said.
Like the anniversary of the disappearance of Imam al-Sadr, and Hezbollah’s Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem, Congress President Nabi Beli emphasized that there is no negotiation on weapons of resistance.
Berry reiterated that the issue should be discussed under the auspices of the Constitution, not within the framework of a consensus-based national dialogue, rather than external or internal pressure.
The warning against Netanyahu’s expansionist scheme to Lebanon stated that “weapons are our pride and our honor,” and rejected attempts to force the Army to stand up to resistance.
The Parliamentary Speaker also attacked those who were leaning towards Israeli attacks and accused Shias of bullying them as “the founding sect of Lebanese society.”
This call for dialogue had previously been passed down to President Joseph Own by Beli, particularly in light of Israel’s rejection and incommunity.
Beli had sought to reach a unified position to protect Lebanon’s rights at least, but Prime Minister Nawaf Salam refused due to pressure from Saudi Arabia and the US.
But the greater responsibility is well aware of the dangers of trying to arm Hezbollah at the expense of the country’s peace.
This was highlighted by MP Mohammad Rad, director of Hezbollah’s loyalty to the Resistance Congress bloc to President Ounce’s Brigadier General, Brigadier General Andre Rahal. Raad tells Aoun that he is interested in Salam’s volatility, pushing Lebanon into chaos, leaving him prey to Israeli attacks.
It is noteworthy that the military is not due to political consensus, or lack of competence and personnel, but not because at least half of the Lebanese people recognize that at least half of the Lebanese population is opposed to the plan, but the mission given to the Army by the Nawafsalam government to disarm resistance is being hampered.
Repeated violations of Israel’s Lebanese sovereignty confirm that the “arms monopoly” slogan is purely Israeli purpose.
Meanwhile, Israel’s enemies appear to be rushing to a decision in fear that Hezbollah will soon recover its power, or trembling in fear that Hezbollah will drop a missile on stolen Palestinian territory.
Due to the accomplices of the Lebanese government, Israel is acting as if the opportunity to deal with the serious blow to Hezbollah may not recur in the future. The harsh blows have not eradicated highly ideological organisations that are immobilized and adaptable, and recognize that delays can provide resistance with the perfect opportunity to take initiatives at their own hands.
Recently, residents of many border villages on the border with occupied Palestine revealed that enemy forces infiltrating across the border are permanently infiltrating.
As the government did not play a role in protecting border villages in the south, Israeli occupation forces have passed through Lebanese military checkpoints and barracks without any interference.
Israel has undoubtedly been revealed from a final conflict with greater freedom of movement, but it would be enough to smash the image of doubts of victory once again, when the Hezbollah missiles fall into occupied Palestine.
As Speaker of the Council, Navi Beli, said, Lebanon’s Pro Israel Camp is trying to harness historic opportunities to eliminate resistance.
Israeli rog arrogance does not allow “concessions.” They prefer to perpetuate the equation of superiority and hegemony. This once again strengthens Hezbollah’s legitimate rights to continue holding weapons.