Beirut – Said Ari Khamenei, the leader of the Islamic Revolution, reiterated that Martil Sayed Hassan Nasrara was “a source of wealth not only in the Shiites but also in the Islamic world.”
Ayatollah Khamenei says, “This wealth continues, and the Hezbollah story continues.”
“His wealth is the source of great wealth for Lebanon and even more,” emphasizes Ayatollah Khamenei.
But in the midst of the important issues and challenges he must deal with, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam launched a preemptive battle over legality commemorating the anniversary of Hezbollah’s secretary Sayad Nasrara and his deputy Hashem Safidideen’s marry.
Salam issued instructions strictly prohibiting the use of public property without prior permission as Hazbollah intends to light the Lauche Rock (a landmark of Beirut’s natural heritage) with images of Nasrara and Safiedin.
This is an opportunity to point out that the Prime Minister is a judge and legal scholar, but he is unaware of the major differences between natural landmarks and government facilities and buildings.
According to Article 1 of Lebanon’s Public Property Act, the use of these natural features for activities other than permanent facilities and investment is open to everyone, like the beach.
The law further provides that the organizer is only necessary to notify the Governor of the assembly to achieve informational notices rather than permission.
Nawaf Salam’s rebellious actions reveal Washington’s fears over repeating scenes of the presence of the masses in support of resistance in the capital, as happened during the funeral last February.
Without a doubt, the only party Nawafsalam loved him to his present position. Therefore, he realized that he was forced to follow the Saudi Arabian demands of the US and Saudi Arabia to ensure that Hezbollah did not prevent him from illuminating the rocks of Rauche.
Nawaf Salam has no interest in the situation in the Rauche area or the rocks themselves.
If Nawaf Salam is forcing the Army to disarm the Resistance Front, it is no surprise that he will not oppose the recent threats of US envoy Thomas Barrack, but will hamper the respect of its most prominent leader.
According to some analysts, the Barracks threat could be a prelude to the resumption of hostilities, according to the Lebanese Army’s previous eve of the required monthly report on the progress of the first phase of its disarmament programme.
According to sources, the Barracks statement came after a string of harsh criticism from the Israeli lobby.