London – Most short- and medium-term strategies adopted by the West are either partially realized or not through its various American regimes. That’s almost two years after the vision of a “new Middle East” unfolds and the war with Gaza.
This also applies to how the Post9/11 strategy was seen in the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Frequently planned things don’t happen, or can’t be achieved on the ground. Often, unexpected elements and results appear, confusing the original calculation.
The truth about Lebanon is that, except for the balance of power, nothing controls the movement of events on earth. This has something to ask. Are the prepared plans and papers sufficient? If it is not compatible with the actual balance of earthly forces, is the talk and the front and back going well? Or do you just talk about it for a conversation?
This raises a bigger question. Given the lack of accurate knowledge about how the balance of power on the ground evolved after the “Battle of the Strong,” the photographs are no longer before this battle of battle and support.
When talking about the balance of forces between Israeli occupational entities and resistance, it certainly is not the same. From a quantity perspective, quality perspective, and from a method and conflict planning perspective.
A lot of things change and awareness needs to be built in light of these changes. However, the estimate remains helpless until tested. Therefore, there are many stories to feel the pulse and learn the real situation. Through a vision to measure possible responses through test balloons within demand and vision.
As the party’s executive director stated, when the response came firmly and decisively, it considered the Cabinet’s decision to ratify the American paper for crime, treating it as if it were once and invalid.
In a subsequent speech, he said that any attempt to implement paper and attack weapons would be a Calval-like battle, regardless of the circumstances. This is a red line. Then in his third speech he considered disarmament to be something that stripped off his soul.
Is this enough to give the impression that the party has fully rebuilt itself in a new vision and tactic, and is it a new way to hide it from the enemy? What is its nature and what is its ability? Are these enemies trying to test this existence and learn about these new formations and publicly about them, or is gambling very dangerous in this issue leading to many outcomes that anyone would want to avoid?
There are fixed issues and changing issues. One fixed issue is that the US administration has reached a conclusion through the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that coordinates the political influence on the balance of power on earth.
They assumed that the party lost the battle and adjusted the political balance accordingly based on that assumption. They brought what they wanted to bring to the presidency and the prime minister. Rather than being based on the balance of powers that the party has the advantage, the transaction is based on the balance of powers that the entity has won.
This has a political effect. The American administration is coming along with political parties that wanted to seize power, and is trying to completely remove the resistance party from Lebanon’s political life and completely disarm it. If the results are tested and lead to instability, they can produce results that are contrary to Western interests.